IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Simultaneous connection migration (#490)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Fri, 19 May 2017 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3343E12945E for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 May 2017 08:27:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.183
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.183 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p1UXE46-B5ln for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 May 2017 08:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o4.sgmail.github.com (o4.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECCC4129422 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 May 2017 08:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=d4Vtx7erGpWjpD4gAk111v7Cd8o=; b=JYjkxCt6/zFhn1Uq EzGFcsXIXNa0ts9GtwyJFK9wCnFyeKKJ9u6lLLVH45esbWowDLjyLo6EHjUvJfJr j68Zrr9WLrDEcUFAOyD5t4znI3fJEH29vmimBTBrI8VC9YcZLxcq1z11ceQzIXGx BsaZM5yAUT+3Rw3PeGdIjc9f590=
Received: by filter0690p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0690p1mdw1-29747-591F0EC0-57 2017-05-19 15:26:56.79723624 +0000 UTC
Received: from github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2a-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.16]) by ismtpd0004p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id tGJTGgwARfyto8741Rzgwg for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 May 2017 15:26:56.743 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 08:26:56 -0700
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab73ebc20775f6d69364618216bffa339d4a61c47f92cf000000011536d0c092a169ce0d7229b3@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/490/302733931@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/490@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/490@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Simultaneous connection migration (#490)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_591f0ec0738ba_4c533fdf2087fc3c136e1"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2NySQITCyHEyg1669iRmoW6Zg3jaFFL1H5iI DfaqsiY4hlOnjwIIk/ngvttvLhkEDbWNaMOYl0ibHhxYtd+xxUuV55WrVNv+sW7kHOe5qfZ/dDiaom uB042PKFAMf6To06/XT6xXaCsmHfoTT90IYecnKwTIiwlLziQ1WoTdbxJrHav1YhketfqlBgzWir4K o=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/R8Cqu2S86Oy9ZWohOh_rszsK_No>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 15:27:40 -0000

> Even if it is strictly "last received", how would it fail? At worst, it would take an extra rtt to settle, in case pre-migration and post-migration packets get re-ordered.

right, though sender might be lazy with acks resulting in unexpected latency.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/490#issuecomment-302733931

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email