Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3 has less concurrency than HTTP/2 (#2787)

Mike Bishop <> Mon, 17 June 2019 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBD912004F for <>; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 14:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.463
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YrGbqVX02Hg6 for <>; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 14:36:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F06C1120191 for <>; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 14:36:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 14:36:02 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1560807362; bh=VSbEZW5sdJBYzei6zk1y1BkodhqQAQbVjGi/2C97tHc=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Klh8s/OuYKMlGLF4hff2NmlRBRcaZvfTQ/JRnXufgOs2wwPjOma5sTeydk8oVSqrx +PgVaCLqnXCIxEEx3ZtK52sPge3gacER4M60avWsVs/qb2vNRPUvMEs9A0RYLTdEMa azB16sw/B/TjB3ddmExjVcxZZXk3PkCA4qZOo7Ns=
From: Mike Bishop <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2787/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] HTTP/3 has less concurrency than HTTP/2 (#2787)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d0807c2d1f57_60f63f96b64cd95c951f9"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 21:36:09 -0000

I'm more inclined toward that as well.  I agree that the recommendation is to allow ~100 concurrent requests, and transport implementations could decide to consider it safe to re-issue the stream at different points in the request lifecycle.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: