Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Cumulative RCID frame (with gaps) (#3553)

ianswett <> Wed, 01 April 2020 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F943A0F00 for <>; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 06:33:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.446
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.446 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, GB_SUMOF=5, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ji8zkjObWMeb for <>; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 06:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D8EA3A0EFB for <>; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 06:33:34 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 06:33:33 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1585748013; bh=7KgvRPwKctRkZIkku2keMYSxdh/h4JtYwIuye4FQ/YU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=R412fghYs+NdrnBPm0+Hah3si9oXFoyBqHUXceljphKWYI2xDmmaqLQKo22CA25Y4 5u5+2ISiRre8251xgNcKoimgkQk3caTuPyAB+imk2r0M3ZCoYkqRIUMoy+1GTUvhVk Atbg65uT98RaWnts2iaf55lJwoRhd0PWSkRfe77Q=
From: ianswett <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3553/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Cumulative RCID frame (with gaps) (#3553)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e84982d13331_77923fad612cd960692b9"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 13:33:36 -0000

@ianswett commented on this pull request.

> @@ -5595,6 +5595,14 @@ frame multiple times MUST NOT be treated as a connection error.  A receiver can
 use the sequence number supplied in the NEW_CONNECTION_ID frame to identify new
 connection IDs from old ones.
+When receiving a NEW_CONNECTION_ID frame carrying a sequence number greater than
+those that have been previously received, an endpoint MUST check that the sum of

Something like this seems like a sensible check I thought we already had?  If not, adding it seems separable from this PR?

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: