Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] More strongly recommend ECN marking (#3373)
Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Wed, 05 February 2020 10:51 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D456D1207FC for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 02:51:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uQV9Pf2b_UN8 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 02:51:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-27.smtp.github.com (out-27.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87BFE12012D for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 02:51:10 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 02:51:08 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1580899868; bh=F3zvayanyOJLH5o1dY3/YQjxbyhkNoiae1HxwxhOi3Y=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=c3bPm3Vq7QmAW8l5VbtkQUQRL72D4Pi7eq2rf6UpIE+13rjeH/l71pVkiKS2zDE5F LlMLZgOpkx87jGZ5ORSVACbGfsvj+VFt8w7+4ifMOnPQjLaFrdBkMtZ/8tSoof8N6J x8zMhBXa13/obqjItS7thiC/8wUTq2VcvofGEDRw=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK7FOVORYIRCVTTAYM54I7IJZEVBNHHCB6L7OA@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3373/582350400@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3373@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3373@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] More strongly recommend ECN marking (#3373)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e3a9e1cc6094_2b963fe1cb0cd9641223e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/WnfkbN8bfz6XFGa4_d2AZ9fYoUQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 10:51:15 -0000
This is just about this one paragraph: > To reduce the chances of misinterpreting congestive loss as packets dropped by a faulty network element, an endpoint could set the ECT(0) codepoint in the first ten outgoing packets on a path, or for a period of three RTTs, whichever occurs first. The concrete proposal would be to remove this paragraph. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3373#issuecomment-582350400
- [quicwg/base-drafts] More strongly recommend ECN … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] More strongly recommend … ekr
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] More strongly recommend … mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] More strongly recommend … Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] More strongly recommend … Christian Huitema
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] More strongly recommend … Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] More strongly recommend … mirjak
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] More strongly recommend … Martin Thomson