Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can VN and Retry packets be coalesced? (#2407)

Kazuho Oku <> Fri, 22 February 2019 06:21 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4926E12D4F2 for <>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:21:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j2qgbUt2Pz7g for <>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:21:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62194129BBF for <>; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:21:27 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 22:21:26 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1550816486; bh=2SRL/bSxCnUo/++6HLoyvxKjhwHfWVcD5Ceru+zr8I8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=T4QsU3qYpZHoenuQQ2malEP3Oxtferp1i7LPp844WjVpgicGFhgSiV510F0UGsq59 V2104wibH+13rVbCWSHA0FkxoEpNdC3ny/PZBFRMYFIBWd9iMZzjit2GnRei+Xrqd2 GqtrvMQQJeALhsF0qpkc4AhVdkCssO3t9aT4tbB8=
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2407/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Can VN and Retry packets be coalesced? (#2407)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c6f94e642351_10863f82630d45c4274628"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 06:21:29 -0000

@janaiyengar Simply clarifying that "VN and Retry packets will never be coalesced" as part of the changes we would make in #2308 might be a good idea.

We do not need to use a RFC 2119 word here due to the editorial nature of the issue.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: