Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Backoff on CONNECTION_CLOSE (#3157)

Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Tue, 29 October 2019 00:19 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27301120047 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 17:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.596
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AICoIPw_7hcB for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 17:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-20.smtp.github.com (out-20.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.203]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83C2A12003E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 17:19:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-f045d1f.ac4-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-f045d1f.ac4-iad.github.net [10.52.19.54]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBBF8C09F8 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2019 17:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1572308385; bh=ixK6e5+TfnagfCbDqf1d2XF9zgrRaDzUXDjESsE3rxw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=SwmmWMwnufl6wWME8geNazmqRk8eweY9kw5AODGO+ttWtF1Jbce/wh8akGt7kgLG+ J/MO0wAFOi/A9fy42s4zCQQWSz+6ImN580Xd7TJcNKVu6iDj6q5F7cYE9uKMj767nr 7Nu1/UoBS2nyU16C4uPjLx7BX6TRB6NwkIjeNvGc=
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 17:19:45 -0700
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKYUYWWFXKXC2SYGESN3YS4CDEVBNHHB5FPVAE@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3157/review/308218237@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3157@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3157@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Backoff on CONNECTION_CLOSE (#3157)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5db785a18bc7d_67fb3fe9e6ecd960985b8"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/Xw85pGLuOd9-0-PQyFqCZ7RUcy8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:19:48 -0000

kazuho commented on this pull request.



>  CONNECTION_CLOSE frame.  For instance, an endpoint could progressively increase
 the number of packets that it receives before sending additional packets or
-increase the time between packets.
+increase the time between packets.  An endpoint that drops the packet protection
+keys when entering the closing period and therefore being unable to decrypt the

Thank you for the suggestions. I think they are covered by a45ded2.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3157#discussion_r339848067