Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should number of Tail Loss Probes be 1 or 2? (#2185)
ianswett <notifications@github.com> Tue, 26 March 2019 10:53 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DAC61202D1 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 03:53:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.383
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.383 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1vHis_G75dPu for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 03:53:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-1.smtp.github.com (out-1.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A66D61202BD for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 03:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 03:53:31 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1553597611; bh=A0svMBpLWeyPk899EI0h7I0L2oC3Zl9Gl7k8VmEr8lw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=op09MpueOJxR7XsNvs5tdE3uyLVCnaQbaK0QUfo1dt1sW0ad3e6C6KvePr6GtE4vy 4CsIXYoaL+VbKHvstfSnJgtXNLIAwYbEsvS93otFe6O/BjDRsU/r0zQ//0Ll+Q/+/v xBW6bNH6np2kJ8PUNTUSXtQNWuyYQw7p87xDAAxI=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4aba3248fd9586c94b6c8f86598ea1cfc6dfb061f6892cf0000000118b1c6ab92a169ce174e08c8@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issue/2185/issue_event/2229276169@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2185@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2185@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should number of Tail Loss Probes be 1 or 2? (#2185)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c9a04ab48c0a_67a63fcea56d45bc1714b1"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ZAKfKCCVS-lK1ZkMPODCCzO6iVM>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 10:53:36 -0000
Closed #2185. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2185#event-2229276169
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Should number of Tail Loss P… Praveen Balasubramanian
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should number of Tail Lo… ianswett
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Should number of Tail Lo… ianswett