IETF Logo Mail Archive

[quicwg/base-drafts] UDP-like, not exclusively UDP (#1250)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Tue, 27 March 2018 03:22 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817F11270AE for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 20:22:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.391
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.391 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TKYY2bXlLJ3Q for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 20:22:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o5.sgmail.github.com (o5.sgmail.github.com [192.254.113.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63444126E64 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 20:22:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=8t8CZ01579C+aVdR2z/cmuly1e8=; b=s0pkoiu3Jrr01JMg AWpilJbuQbRcyph6lE4EH9zl+omlA8t26Wr440GOeUDbJLfZO+0RbEpdIwbjYUX+ cKn0RKA6tU4R5GLRICT5JBK1pOMvOEvS0HpPbFxu5UsUcirnbNHIlwcftuvf1SPD /FF1mL4LBpI241mb6UqOxBbR1HY=
Received: by filter0187p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0187p1las1-4123-5AB9B8DB-3 2018-03-27 03:22:03.274708835 +0000 UTC
Received: from smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) by ismtpd0004p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id 3J-8dzjzSpC7p_PjDLrMKA for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 03:22:02.177 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 03:22:03 +0000
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab5c7f42caa189595de0890b38b841d4ec0576eccb92cf0000000116d17ada92a169ce12680a86@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1250@github.com>
Subject: [quicwg/base-drafts] UDP-like, not exclusively UDP (#1250)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ab9b8da65d8a_d7f2b046f6d0ecc76175"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1nuchaHJn7ycFkO1Ia6GlfqS3CwEJEOd1Hkg tM44x+biS3s+VknfcMlYFsIPr9qctM1QWP+NPPdE9zuiTwrsw9BC8t9dlm4bb1gXxIu/NmQv7ZjvND 1ELHoFDNhVxuYD0rAzDXQkqiLvcamrIeCV6MXwGV8ypWVDyA/s381/ZUSjVARG0tCGB2xRhAo+oSEr 8=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ZM8W7ybik4R-Et8oT5bZaPtOSJg>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 03:22:04 -0000

@enygren suggests:

Would it make sense to say that "endpoints exchange QUIC packets via a datagram protocol such as UDP"?  While we are currently only defining on UDP, there is nothing in invariants that would force this perpetually.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1250

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email