Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ICMP DOS (#2063)

ekr <notifications@github.com> Fri, 14 December 2018 01:07 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B6A130ED9 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 17:07:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.056
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.056 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id itezK3r_7JLM for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 17:07:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74754130EBF for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 17:07:36 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 17:07:35 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1544749655; bh=cyk2v2FToT/eEcAQC7n4HyyPvGrY6AyrkvdCxyd4r+E=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=YSUsoWpleIehvlXXAsR0bO2CzSknyxftZDDGDa3RUv+RrzfaXShpfJLvoNfrDk59o YBGAF/P7zw3Cq3qNpOzLF34MbnJowdmbdp6WofbIgSQBvh3HTEcgwmsshclqVnKlmI sEvd59Id3LfHdrBIdSG0MjcX7IVA6bJiPK5SfSlg=
From: ekr <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab72bbafdae5388155a80c827b10c2392d0c42501892cf00000001182ac45792a169ce16f604d0@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2063/447177675@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2063@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2063@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ICMP DOS (#2063)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c1302579810d_42ec3f7e79ad45bc104141"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ekr
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/_NdHy72O-4klulX5qpPSH8g5an0>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 01:07:39 -0000

the relevant text is in 14.1.

```
   If a QUIC endpoint determines that the PMTU between any pair of local
   and remote IP addresses has fallen below the size needed to support
   the smallest allowed maximum packet size, it MUST immediately cease
   sending QUIC packets on the affected path.  An endpoint MAY terminate
   the connection if an alternative path cannot be found.
```

This would apply to other methods than ICMP PTB, for instance, Ethernet or VPN MTU reduction

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2063#issuecomment-447177675