Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend sending a token (#2121)

janaiyengar <> Thu, 13 December 2018 02:25 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A161293FB for <>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 18:25:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.842
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.842 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2jBvIx7ct4lx for <>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 18:25:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0528F128CFD for <>; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 18:25:37 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 18:25:36 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1544667936; bh=XiG3Z0/Kap0OykvXLdxC4bTxbyymE6+gTU7sZyBkbLg=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=aNcVvmJs06EoAMb3cM8oB6D8WHwOb4Vioihcm+aTR0r2xkZNhwNtkD//wP7JlSXw2 EVG9+KA4Y7JTfZ47s1mrhMEVo0M+4/UpHRxdWfYmCoD6IfJaS/8q4nysAmW6ki5FtY y/3pWvneVd1v1GuACf6+uDwm60hWAtvvRhY12RVI=
From: janaiyengar <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2121/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Recommend sending a token (#2121)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c11c3201dc0e_db63fa4610d45b8313636"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 02:25:39 -0000

It does make sense to say SHOULD if we want to encourage lower connection establishment latency, which we do (we state this as one of QUIC's features). I'd be fine with a SHOULD here.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: