IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID's should be compared in constant time (#2477)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Tue, 19 February 2019 06:59 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B68130E7E for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 22:59:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WC0EmIJVJ0Ox for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 22:59:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o9.sgmail.github.com (o9.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9FB8130E78 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 22:59:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=vJtfD2D/fsyysyDUPmVE/x0YEYQ=; b=DRZdjKIlqx8eERUS +MFowcAiqQFa6enyLMDtjocA4juztUi0DJjbzlg28INIsCK30JF6mFntBKCCXKKy ty6hXhlSwbF1uWPDtNygw2Akimntz6HB6Nmuvfl1TaY43xeGT1N1RrcbptwEWB/U DDQ+XMuHSz9jm+1D6NX/xToQMic=
Received: by filter0102p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0102p1iad2-4699-5C6BA952-17 2019-02-19 06:59:30.545746071 +0000 UTC m=+1161342.543115088
Received: from github-lowworker-e51511d.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.34]) by ismtpd0050p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id sk4Ygg8YRQ-JWhgj6WicLw for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 06:59:30.477 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-e51511d.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F27280C4C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 22:59:30 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 06:59:30 +0000
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab1c3c7d0eec92a656e2aa3edad52aed3ef58a985592cf0000000118836b5292a169ce187e182d@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2477/465009908@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2477@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2477@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID's should be compared in constant time (#2477)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c6ba9525dad2_2eb3fa82e8d45bc3063918"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0215tCvqmZmEaP7mSndHoI/U2rwla+BwG1QQ Aef5UqmtAI7ArrGoXxpWyGnc92syrqcRPiKXd/ht3yNX+E9W57gPBfb+o+25L8SRZPWX97DuquTTUh MvsZ2SUIbrqsfWl+QpmfHGBCZJHLx4JcoF1TcFNwy267+u7rkJiKhybEtg==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/dU-zcUA32X8mAXrRzBOflvKBOXE>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 06:59:33 -0000

No arguments here, but why are we so determined on protecting against packet number guessing, but not CID guessing? https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-tls-18#page-30 (QUIC-TLS section 9.3)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2477#issuecomment-465009908

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email