Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] NEW_TOKEN should be symmetric (#2760)

Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com> Fri, 31 May 2019 05:29 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8871B1200D6 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 May 2019 22:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.806
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.806 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.415, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sjSKqNjFvUpP for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 May 2019 22:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B82A8120088 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 May 2019 22:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 22:29:03 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1559280543; bh=glqGNUemqVQJJeAXk0TqCtqnh/aVoZ7GOwJUcnJCTQ0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=YJl2JqcIkFUz/6ijNrN2BVzBSFGsUQaSWjlfXAvWtRDtvhsSIl6Hi4k+8m1UsF6Ob RuUKckAlpW3fqSbJsCzrQcCK7xJxh8gvvQurc3nEkL/gYNSBEtyYcCihP5rMMDb+zM M2WUDbXuz50bPuvU54doaAlLmDCpU1E4sSGM08pI=
From: Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK4TIQY7NFK2OKFISHF27XXB7EVBNHHBVVRQLI@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2760/497580828@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2760@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2760@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] NEW_TOKEN should be symmetric (#2760)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cf0bb9f9a9b9_cb13ffa6cccd96c9070b8"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: marten-seemann
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/e_iTS1EwrnByx__Xlv5tq663psw>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 05:29:06 -0000

> The handshake is asymmetric in QUIC, and tokens are sent only by a client during the handshake. At the moment, there's no mechanism by which a token sent by a client can be used by a server.

I don't want to change any of that. I'm just talking about the case where the two peers reconnect, this time with switched roles. In a p2p setting, this frequently occurs, and the terms "client" and "server" have little meaning beyond identifying who initiated the connection.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2760#issuecomment-497580828