IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client MUST use 1-RTT packets if it reads 1-RTT packets (#2458)

Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Fri, 15 February 2019 11:33 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB192128D0B for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 03:33:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vHPGqd6G-nuU for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 03:33:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-13.smtp.github.com (out-13.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04868130DC9 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 03:33:25 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 03:33:25 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1550230405; bh=dVsuyWC9ROm0GLI+o+dGKzYiKIA9kyUQlqbA2HuIoGw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=zhExEy269gpQMH8iXp16gzaef39j7l8ccJGsukT+iyDB8/rLMDs3BG5RPsP5f8PBB OxqK95yM6aOEDg/Gb7i4/Sf6INx+s9fV43RG1t+1JDyPMlVx9IhGI3qsJdPUUuVie7 21ifYRxI7CRVislTnl0qTYZv4EaqzLnpw14RtK78=
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab9eb6fbe1497c3cd9c825ae30c41e18d771f6a91092cf00000001187e658592a169ce18696af1@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2458/464013097@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2458@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2458@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Client MUST use 1-RTT packets if it reads 1-RTT packets (#2458)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c66a3854b4b6_2f773fd0d82d45b8401216"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/eb6TAYSTcc6kvi3WOhHp7TdFneY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 11:33:28 -0000

@ianswett 
> I think this should be stated in transport as well as TLS

Agreed.

> along with a statement that a server MAY/SHOULD/MUST ignore 0RTT packets that have higher packet numbers than the first received 1RTT packet.

I think that this should be a MAY/SHOULD close the connection with PROTOCOL_VIOLATION rather than "ignore", because that aligns the handling with how we agreed to handle other misuse of 0-RTT packets (see 
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2360#issuecomment-459171200).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2458#issuecomment-464013097

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email