Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] In Initial and Handshake packets, knowing undecryptable packets could accelerate handshakes with loss (#2894)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Mon, 15 July 2019 00:13 UTC

Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 17:13:10 -0700
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK25LJEHTEPWOQDDTB53HD3ZNEVBNHHBXYFAF4@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2894/511246804@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2894@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2894@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] In Initial and Handshake packets, knowing undecryptable packets could accelerate handshakes with loss (#2894)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d2bc51630d26_113a3ffb0cccd96c2256e0"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/fdWbidQ-iaCEWy0mFAQ8R38tCv4>

I don't get how the removal of Largest Acknowledged would work.  We use that as an anchor point for the ACK frame, but without it you need to start at 0.  Then you need to allow the first range (or gap, depending on where you want to start) be zero-length.  It's not really that simple.

This smells a lot like a v2 issue to me.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2894#issuecomment-511246804

[quicwg/base-drafts] In Initial and Handshake pac… ianswett
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] In Initial and Handshake… Martin Thomson
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] In Initial and Handshake… ianswett
Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] In Initial and Handshake… ianswett