Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Description of the use of Preferred Address is unclear (#3353)

Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com> Thu, 06 February 2020 08:51 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 908081201A3 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 00:51:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pAuLEAQprU-v for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 00:51:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-17.smtp.github.com (out-17.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69FBF1200CE for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 00:51:04 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:51:03 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1580979063; bh=drJzc94nw5HTvA6Wo9rqw+/AEqSZrE1AtpgGOA8BnSo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=he9FlH4KmVd/wtiWAMnZwZk+hq5PRMRjTt8iM68SP/VN401cgxa+o4UqYUc5+LwpZ Iw4WwUP4VJ+d50yoZQyTmLlFe9NRsldfY1vy8f+QDqTRS5iMvW4mmSq0GPQByhsSVV AKI54YIfLBe1N3Wb9mkk7Bx0DHXUVnBUp55/GoRU=
From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK33ZQ7ECYXBJ6JHSNF4JEC7PEVBNHHCBWF2DE@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3353/582798449@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3353@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3353@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Description of the use of Preferred Address is unclear (#3353)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e3bd377845d6_d483fa5986cd96448341c"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/j64pGq-1gL1WajvuyQrSwTeGchY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 08:51:07 -0000

An important point to capture here is that the server is responsible for ensuring that the connection IDs are not bound to one or other address at this stage (if migration is successful, later ones might be).  Thus, the connection ID in the transport parameter is no different to any other connection ID; it only exists here because using the new address is unusable without more connection IDs being available.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3353#issuecomment-582798449