Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use handshake bytes more consistently (#3775)

Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com> Tue, 23 June 2020 22:01 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2193A0BCA for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fR5Dc1VC0Il9 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-21.smtp.github.com (out-21.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 333D53A0BC9 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-cde56e0.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-cde56e0.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.25.52]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F89A0C3F for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1592949665; bh=mZaz4EaLn4ebXE3oCb3nqZ/wW973DFQUrHK1u6e0jSA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=CONSCDBeDL9raN+iVXBk9KdisUe8MAD6WihR75/bAHSzQxlXUwlBa8Xxeu0uadHiV 5iyRwOhBPT6aQp5VYR1ZrsfBvDBTfCTkSaczrmkJLzk9cm0In+77YeLadreLOR/+kS ayO7BXFWisB9/GcAf9X9ig49ALBJYVHH7SJ6xR1s=
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 15:01:05 -0700
From: Mike Bishop <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK5MMK5RXSU55LI5BX547ZOKDEVBNHHCMMSNNY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3775/review/436130428@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3775@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3775@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Use handshake bytes more consistently (#3775)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5ef27ba1a205_20a23f86a5ecd9641767db"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/k1CCRRGs_e9BR1vcMKTNOZxIKxI>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 22:01:08 -0000

@MikeBishop approved this pull request.



> @@ -429,14 +430,15 @@ the packet type and keys that are used for protecting data.
 
 Each encryption level is associated with a different sequence of bytes, which is
 reliably transmitted to the peer in CRYPTO frames. When TLS provides handshake
-bytes to be sent, they are appended to the current flow. Any packet that
-includes the CRYPTO frame is protected using keys from the corresponding
-encryption level. Four encryption levels are used, producing keys for Initial,
-0-RTT, Handshake, and 1-RTT packets. CRYPTO frames are carried in just three of
-these levels, omitting the 0-RTT level. These four levels correspond to three
-packet number spaces: Initial and Handshake encrypted packets use their own
-separate spaces; 0-RTT and 1-RTT packets use the application data packet number
-space.
+bytes to be sent, they are appended to the handshake bytes for the current
+encryption level. Any packet that includes the CRYPTO frame is protected using
+keys from the corresponding encryption level.

Not new text, but this feels like it's reversed.  It's not the fact that it includes these bytes that causes a packet to use particular keys; the level of these bytes determines which packet type it must be sent in.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3775#pullrequestreview-436130428