Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make keep-alive advice more generic (#3745)

Lucas Pardue <> Tue, 09 June 2020 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B333A00B3 for <>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 07:21:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.555
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zXMR0WqdhNc7 for <>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 07:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EB083A00B2 for <>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 07:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8926E960085 for <>; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 07:21:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1591712508; bh=HN4nMDIC313hDtxqhluzQu9iIaLQkIypRdByNQqKkVs=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=KSDOuHEXZhzVCFqRaFTbQU7bYngwi3u6Jv+sJg4w5K7gVAyVQpZ3YMpaVXU9U3Woj opspVjrKmTN8O0ZbH1hCp15YtrNf+Fi7AQN/YyVyWadU1pbBaIYtp1kI117V2CFI9Z hxLxIb5T8mnczGUb6yqDExoDtgJWfYkE7/8uwDYo=
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 07:21:48 -0700
From: Lucas Pardue <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3745/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make keep-alive advice more generic (#3745)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5edf9afc792b8_55833ff5d5acd9643365c5"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 14:21:51 -0000

@LPardue commented on this pull request.

> +idle timeout is appropriate.  Uncoordinated or unnecessary sending of PING
+frames could have a detrimental effect on performance.

I'm finding it a little difficult to understand what coordination means in this paragraph. Previously, the mention of coordination followed some specific advice that has been axed.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: