Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] unclear definition of persistent congestion (#3937)
Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Wed, 22 July 2020 05:06 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2AD3A0DC5 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 22:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.555
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id unzLu4gcL_e3 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 22:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-17.smtp.github.com (out-17.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F2CA3A0DC4 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 22:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-6b40fdd.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-6b40fdd.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.16.64]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27CC6E0058 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 22:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1595394380; bh=uZ86b8EpOEAey9KkGjexiX9YZhEUKJ4tYf+WkHlYa50=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=RSTiYwo54p5cTPi8hxGHQ2RelX2t7OUmXm12vY2m3OxxIERSvg9OqgJ+3PZyaTbHM ooRMQjI8V9aebvDe6Tcy5Kk0mi5dNRpCPNfNW/bxkNalKybNnjMF580MMQm/01SQrD N5LnXKJK5AMaMqjAPI8OcxNlike+OJGqmBoQOdEE=
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 22:06:20 -0700
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK7LYVEVQADHUI3OBE55EOVEZEVBNHHCPCXWJY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3937/662243363@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3937@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3937@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] unclear definition of persistent congestion (#3937)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5f17c94cb2d5f_1b2c3fdf848cd9641550ee"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/lvphsQ2tkCg6h4f0dwaEiSHPTGQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 05:06:24 -0000
FWIW, we had some discussion regarding the design rationale behind persistent congestion in #3875, and it seemed to me that it was mostly about the amount of time the sender cannot make any progress. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3937#issuecomment-662243363
- [quicwg/base-drafts] unclear definition of persis… Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] unclear definition of pe… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] unclear definition of pe… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] unclear definition of pe… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] unclear definition of pe… Vidhi Goel
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] unclear definition of pe… Jana Iyengar
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] unclear definition of pe… Jana Iyengar