Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ChaCha inputs (#2171)

Martin Thomson <> Mon, 26 August 2019 10:30 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA5A1200EC for <>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 03:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0JewIhlAyW4r for <>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 03:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C98512001E for <>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 03:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 03:30:27 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1566815427; bh=s0hgy18xgmrPqN1baznFnwU14JwoCxbd1o3Am76DjZ8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Rxt8yESgrfsoyp3ARKG7uPnayFpGR3MiRjD8TJup5CrmTVKbv3kdrr9riw0CT8zrT CfT/jSiMW9uWsxstYYy7UYIxwElEliNm43Q6Uep4c2kAcYhwZ8G0Pt8mJWJSa1w6Bu ig0+zGRvMyhAQSZSMM1zNC9/PehU8K4xEKrilBI8=
From: Martin Thomson <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2171/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ChaCha inputs (#2171)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d63b4c34c632_79f13f87618cd96c28415"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinthomson
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 10:30:30 -0000

I don't think that the reinterpretation of the little-endian thing is safe, as per @mikkelfj's comment.

The [PKCS#11 interface]( takes a byte buffer as input rather than a `uint32_t`.  That is to allow for different block counter sizes.  I'll make the editorial change, but leave the suggestion there alone.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: