Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] missing description of what happens when receiving an ACK for an unsent packet (#2298)
MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Sun, 06 January 2019 19:34 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B3C130DDF for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Jan 2019 11:34:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.447
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.065, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7CUbtHRQvtiy for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Jan 2019 11:34:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-6.smtp.github.com (out-6.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B2DC130DD6 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Jan 2019 11:34:48 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2019 11:34:47 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1546803287; bh=etsO3A89wt5Jmhw/gjyUjMd2K1uMZNPYpnaPvFacLGQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Xbhnuc2ycvUpRzwhqv1AsoZYJtl9d632p1xUv+JlRXd0sEhhoYORxD/7Oj81PtX0y Wp05SLuAkJfu7yGosdpZli2bKWc4BwwUnZ4RlnTXag3x5ocYCx8QzBu5JHGKWWvT21 hkrau5vcGBevv+lDaMh2WGC9o3kc8kl6L5Z62bJ4=
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab8db896a26e0b4fb43c8849f97512fb263b05034c92cf00000001184a1a5792a169ce179e2ba1@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2298/451768120@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2298@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2298@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] missing description of what happens when receiving an ACK for an unsent packet (#2298)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c32585756f77_2a33faa21ad45c0233437"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/ogKxI0Cec2yriO-8_LlempnjAzk>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2019 19:34:50 -0000
FYI: the reason this always needs to be treated as hostile (when provable) is because it is the only defence against the potentially very harmful optimistic ack attack. There are very few other other reasons to have gaps in the range, such as when having multiple concurrent transmit queues. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2298#issuecomment-451768120
- [quicwg/base-drafts] missing description of what … Marten Seemann
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] missing description of w… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] missing description of w… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] missing description of w… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] missing description of w… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] missing description of w… Martin Thomson