Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Padding outside QUIC packet (#3333)

ekr <> Sat, 01 February 2020 17:37 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0D312013F for <>; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 09:37:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.454
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KJubiqBMnXBK for <>; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 09:37:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEFAB120103 for <>; Sat, 1 Feb 2020 09:37:16 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2020 09:37:15 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1580578635; bh=uzN35/WwGcp0cjpwlWuC7oKEdJxcqmcL2fSld+3nhgc=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=GKAJzisMoP0koh7KMatby75I7D/7Rnv/5wm9NOoXOQ0zNlSgVkTr/W2ZCk0r3iyMK ss05Su3MRpx07kiodkrHlAJUxtkn4aVBCpBaIiNbGfUT/5C8n09G4YX1kD+X8RZtIi aHqOV3AgqX5NNdriefEOM0oTfKT6LlaYx5XjasNk=
From: ekr <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3333/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Padding outside QUIC packet (#3333)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e35b74bb8ce1_4c913f9c28ccd964747849"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ekr
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2020 17:37:18 -0000

    For the purpose of verifying that an Initial packet is larger than the required minimum, all bytes count.
    For all other purposes, including congestion control and amplification control, only valid packets count.

I don't agree that these bytes shouldn't count for amplification control. Amplification control is about received byes, and these are bytes.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: