Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Does a dynamic table entry insertion needs to be acknowledged for the enttry to become evictable? (#3624)

Dmitri Tikhonov <> Mon, 04 May 2020 20:00 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797B83A0FCD for <>; Mon, 4 May 2020 13:00:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.554
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AWvJueW672De for <>; Mon, 4 May 2020 13:00:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 236AC3A0FC9 for <>; Mon, 4 May 2020 13:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 385BD660328 for <>; Mon, 4 May 2020 13:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1588622419; bh=gt4/GNuc83/Noev7ezO+caUzjIbfyzgXU7Fs2B9SmIo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=wgCmwn5AUcBv0rf53IT1ynz6S34ly7yvp+Tg/l5g1LTOgwh9gTT1bOq7QZp8bwDUC T/sOS67ycjX2iKB3mYwZ3UUaxQ78NM4dxwLgYIhYu6y3ybkzFir/BD+5jooxKh2h8o Fl2dOLQsnwk43OaLzHhGTutBEDHR5iLNcrkvsxf8=
Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 13:00:19 -0700
From: Dmitri Tikhonov <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3624/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Does a dynamic table entry insertion needs to be acknowledged for the enttry to become evictable? (#3624)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5eb0745328782_41153fbd83ccd960149340"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: dtikhonov
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 20:00:39 -0000

Yes, this is necessary.  This is done to prevent unlimited speculative insertions, otherwise wrapped [Required Insert Count]( does not work.  See proposal in issue #1644.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: