Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Does a dynamic table entry insertion needs to be acknowledged for the enttry to become evictable? (#3624)
Dmitri Tikhonov <notifications@github.com> Mon, 04 May 2020 20:00 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797B83A0FCD for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 May 2020 13:00:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.554
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AWvJueW672De for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 May 2020 13:00:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-23.smtp.github.com (out-23.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 236AC3A0FC9 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 May 2020 13:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-cf59896.ash1-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-cf59896.ash1-iad.github.net [10.56.112.26]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 385BD660328 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 May 2020 13:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1588622419; bh=gt4/GNuc83/Noev7ezO+caUzjIbfyzgXU7Fs2B9SmIo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=wgCmwn5AUcBv0rf53IT1ynz6S34ly7yvp+Tg/l5g1LTOgwh9gTT1bOq7QZp8bwDUC T/sOS67ycjX2iKB3mYwZ3UUaxQ78NM4dxwLgYIhYu6y3ybkzFir/BD+5jooxKh2h8o Fl2dOLQsnwk43OaLzHhGTutBEDHR5iLNcrkvsxf8=
Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 13:00:19 -0700
From: Dmitri Tikhonov <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK2TUUSYW4BUM46CGFV4XRKVHEVBNHHCI62K2Q@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3624/623674688@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3624@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3624@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Does a dynamic table entry insertion needs to be acknowledged for the enttry to become evictable? (#3624)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5eb0745328782_41153fbd83ccd960149340"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: dtikhonov
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/rD3SyD0ZeAgFt0wYeC8mFqL9QRM>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 20:00:39 -0000
Yes, this is necessary. This is done to prevent unlimited speculative insertions, otherwise wrapped [Required Insert Count](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-qpack-14#section-4.5.1.1) does not work. See proposal in issue #1644. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3624#issuecomment-623674688
- [quicwg/base-drafts] Does a dynamic table entry i… Dragana Damjanovic
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Does a dynamic table ent… Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Does a dynamic table ent… Dragana Damjanovic
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Does a dynamic table ent… Dragana Damjanovic