Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still required in response to migration? (#2778)
Eric Kinnear <notifications@github.com> Thu, 15 August 2019 18:21 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BB1120090 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QfZYCz0jC-4s for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC8AC120074 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:21:06 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1565893266; bh=vVL+yoLw6U8pWf5JMsZDKRIPvPJZm+5Y05QaMVacbgU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=oCgDpJWIfyZcBCWSu17CwN+Kej6SXoI1xNxgdooA9hf/RRfTqd4t6ec+0PT3sYTS8 h5WOlI8eR5gQVxTsmO0m+TovZn/48n/O9UF/+d5t67mU3i8b1kqrdQsK52bq22472G zuGn1SVhQ7hYUtKKvrDMzXr3L+0hj1NBh0sQEWwo=
From: Eric Kinnear <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK3BYDRRNF2RQ3YQJC53MLKRFEVBNHHBWDXNEU@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2778/521743750@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2778@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2778@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still required in response to migration? (#2778)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d55a292ee96_46a33fe6c42cd964361055"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: erickinnear
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/txt8B0RQ4udR8s5RUe8N9iezkhg>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 18:21:10 -0000
I definitely agree that we should change this to require a change in response, it would be worth wordsmithing something that achieves this -- the PR is a good start. Differentiating by client/server might be interesting, although there appear to be two cases: 1. A CID change on a link without any address change. 2. A change in any part of address (IP/port) We can talk about initiator/responder to migration rather than client/server and that might be a good approach (which is pretty close to what the PR does right now). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2778#issuecomment-521743750
- [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still required in… Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still require… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still require… Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still require… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still require… Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still require… Eric Kinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still require… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still require… Eric Kinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still require… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still require… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still require… Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still require… Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still require… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still require… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still require… Tatsuhiro Tsujikawa
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still require… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still require… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still require… Lars Eggert
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still require… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still require… MikkelFJ
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still require… Martin Thomson
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still require… Kazuho Oku
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still require… Eric Kinnear
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still require… Mike Bishop
- Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still require… Martin Thomson