Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still required in response to migration? (#2778)

Eric Kinnear <> Thu, 15 August 2019 18:21 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BB1120090 for <>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QfZYCz0jC-4s for <>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC8AC120074 for <>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:21:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:21:06 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1565893266; bh=vVL+yoLw6U8pWf5JMsZDKRIPvPJZm+5Y05QaMVacbgU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=oCgDpJWIfyZcBCWSu17CwN+Kej6SXoI1xNxgdooA9hf/RRfTqd4t6ec+0PT3sYTS8 h5WOlI8eR5gQVxTsmO0m+TovZn/48n/O9UF/+d5t67mU3i8b1kqrdQsK52bq22472G zuGn1SVhQ7hYUtKKvrDMzXr3L+0hj1NBh0sQEWwo=
From: Eric Kinnear <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2778/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] CID change still required in response to migration? (#2778)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d55a292ee96_46a33fe6c42cd964361055"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: erickinnear
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 18:21:10 -0000

I definitely agree that we should change this to require a change in response, it would be worth wordsmithing something that achieves this -- the PR is a good start. Differentiating by client/server might be interesting, although there appear to be two cases: 
1. A CID change on a link without any address change. 
2. A change in any part of address (IP/port)

We can talk about initiator/responder to migration rather than client/server and that might be a good approach (which is pretty close to what the PR does right now).

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: