IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Optional packet length field in the short header? (#1831)

Nick Banks <notifications@github.com> Thu, 04 October 2018 13:27 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11A112F1AB for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 06:27:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.456
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.456 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.456, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qxk0JC3oCyGO for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 06:27:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from o4.sgmail.github.com (o4.sgmail.github.com [192.254.112.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1E00128CE4 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 06:27:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=TlZb1xbaAuJYTjBk97meh9Htwh0=; b=ZaVT5LVKCLDJkicn SPN0rRMdsnmv0fvJClAuH9zpaOlDlZwh/P9BT2oVfaT7Pyr+pKrw1rMIXxFUGe8I etRJ/AeAxsh8kZsoMl326aoOcHslEh8igE3rEm6EogrQJZn1s9yed48eG+NRkMsu tDFuQK/Hmv0+y8n0tB6K0qZP5Nc=
Received: by filter1294p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1294p1mdw1-25904-5BB61551-25 2018-10-04 13:27:45.558558072 +0000 UTC m=+760456.459415095
Received: from github-lowworker-1c220e1.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.44]) by ismtpd0010p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id BzfanZefSQmT0Tzyv7136A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Oct 2018 13:27:45.529 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-1c220e1.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F62116358C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Oct 2018 06:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 13:27:45 +0000
From: Nick Banks <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abdc330b5aad9bbc0439db284c3249060690ce3cf992cf0000000117cdd75192a169ce15da6710@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1831/427018136@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1831@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1831@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Optional packet length field in the short header? (#1831)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bb615517a2c6_76e63f8a3bed45b8216846e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: nibanks
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0Ni9AKv2ueiCyWyn4jsuX0fX5R2BCX4xmbA0 ryxIxaKLypllmw+LWvi8OY6YRYY09cE2mNvFuSln8465J5bHWcVHJmHWIy89QQyaGRr55445s7c8hB 7cU2GpNUrEHsqGQXOvupYo8rReNDwWiQkPcus16NfjDcjkFi0WMX0bJMN4UzOcJwR1qF8k7Ht4cIW8 E=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/uUBZ3lZORjyorjJZ6EY9f4o-utc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2018 13:27:49 -0000

At least with my implementation, I don't see a need to coalesce SH packets. I fill each SH packet to the max of the UDP payload size and then move to the next packet.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1831#issuecomment-427018136

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email