IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Merge normative -spin-exp text into -transport (#2369)

Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com> Thu, 24 January 2019 09:56 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7766130EB3 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 01:56:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p3BXA-OEytBy for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 01:56:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A04912D7F8 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 01:56:33 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 01:56:32 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1548323792; bh=eMdKhhxoUZApsiSuzZ66RpluIwx7WweTqn2pFwBKSTg=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=yQJ3SktEoovUL3+LozQrOC9jk9lVZJ3FCJXxbwS4s7G3VVRNrnSs/JEKGn8ue46c8 JYYFj4AxMCAg9r0kp/YxB2I9wm59Q+MHbjs7eaWhvl2WxpFSF6Li6u2QxjT2Y0BMFv Rb/WtFQ0Fdm+A+kDKi3g3EG1+79xVEgmM0X9VoiU=
From: Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4aba0debf7d381eb60cf8984fe03b2f8fdfe23500a892cf0000000118614dd092a169ce17ff5580@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2369/457136673@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2369@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2369@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Merge normative -spin-exp text into -transport (#2369)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c498bd05ad8d_62f93fd262cd45b482517"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: marten-seemann
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/v-IBMT2ADwNCTmNQLG97VpxDECU>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 09:56:35 -0000

Not sure about the process and the formalities, but since the spin-bit is an optional feature, and several implementations are not planning to implement it, I think it would improve the readability of the already very long transport document (141 pages!) to keep it clearly separated in its own document. This would relieve implementers from having to skip over irrelevant text.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2369#issuecomment-457136673

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email