IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ICMP and ICMPv6 PMTUD with asymmetric connection-ids (#1243)

Gorry Fairhurst <notifications@github.com> Sat, 30 June 2018 08:10 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF1F130EF0 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 01:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wkPtOZ1mVrWl for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 01:10:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-4.smtp.github.com (out-4.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52A9D130EE3 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 Jun 2018 01:10:30 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 01:10:28 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1530346228; bh=Wqi632bXzRKcrCiDfJT5YzuhXHhNFWl2y+rSN5tKpSg=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=tCrXZLa8opJPMj2Bv7nozlNMOJuMbuMjglQ4vtggvE5Ghde2pz8PtjaEcZbK1j78D l5FAzR/kEQR+BMnoywQUTnZdwOPI0ZjfLhPe6bsF+SAppcgS/bcOCDOKyfi6RCW4jd tGoS1zsNoCLOpO2ewOqPvgo+pT4H2HehXlrI/FU8=
From: Gorry Fairhurst <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abb95e1221163fce6b4487b04a2ffa5ab6c7f91a4092cf00000001174efcf492a169ce124738ff@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1243/401525861@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1243@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1243@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] ICMP and ICMPv6 PMTUD with asymmetric connection-ids (#1243)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b373af46a43c_241e3faaa7a4af8811432"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: gorryfair
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/vmMcuaYaXx80Awbxyw4qJwd5ZtI>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2018 08:10:32 -0000

Just to be sure myself ..  how does that help a QUIC sender to process a PTB ICMP message?

Gorry 

> On 29 Jun 2018, at 21:15, Igor Lubashev <notifications@github.com> wrote:
> 
> ICMP and Load Balancers is a generic problem, but QUIC has some protocol elements specifically designed to help load balancers (Server CID). It stands to reason that enable those protocol elements to help with ICMP processing in QUIC context.
> 
> @martinduke, which workarounds do you have in mind (unless it is PLPMTUD)? PLPMTUD, for example, specifically states that it works most efficiently with ICMP. So this issue is about enabling ICMP to for for PMTU in the presence of load balancers.
> 
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1243#issuecomment-401525861

v2.40.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status