Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Unclear what to do when QUIC Version Hints are missing (#3061)

David Schinazi <notifications@github.com> Fri, 04 October 2019 23:31 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116AD12002F for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dQpifdRVkfxl for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-20.smtp.github.com (out-20.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.203]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65DA312001E for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from github-lowworker-25680bd.va3-iad.github.net (github-lowworker-25680bd.va3-iad.github.net [10.48.17.61]) by smtp.github.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1488C0026 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 16:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1570231881; bh=5zDbWnjoLCFXyDGygHSLFrIB7ZkNb2JMuARcmt2KMGE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=vBbeHwoTMb4WkcKzHUkgcaaPhfnOEegH90XrW45AIHRXpN+v1sRQ3a7Ibp4Qx+0Je lIOfIH1aQBgJJzl5zPj6Q8Lk4mtan6uH8rtH2orTuT+KNbPORsIYEIpw+gkU0JzDrQ PDMJGjjL9Hb9xnUY9pkaJIkrnC5Pe2J1hIEG/3Xk=
Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 16:31:21 -0700
From: David Schinazi <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK4GSY5NGE4QSZIRBT53UULNTEVBNHHB3JLRAU@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3061/538591213@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3061@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3061@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Unclear what to do when QUIC Version Hints are missing (#3061)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d97d6496e8de_37b03fd3d0ccd95c7038d"; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: DavidSchinazi
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/xJ0MxhexbZlF7wweRYkkOF4NqDM>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2019 23:31:24 -0000

I'm worried that relying on clients to "do the right thing" might cause serious performance issues down the road. I'd prefer to either have explicit guidance, or remove this mechanism until we understand it better as @MikeBishop suggests.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3061#issuecomment-538591213