IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] kInitialRtt of 100 msec is too aggressive (#2184)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Mon, 17 December 2018 09:37 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528F112D4ED for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 01:37:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.842
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.842 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YE7M8_7RTqaN for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 01:37:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o5.sgmail.github.com (o5.sgmail.github.com [192.254.113.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6873E129C6A for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 01:37:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=Np/cemBz1WvzWWaE5v4TzBWmKqY=; b=gChizqtlfoqwu/kn EGkBr7vafmLLn3p4jE8ahzgx9357z2JDfzfaixh5avEgWtL2PH2F/QAc8cp7fQcQ k1Dw1Kxo8Jx6Ei+bRCk1i9bdSvRuJ/KIFZaUIopG6SEUEw70CfttvLSuHGLgCABM zOHEErnk1zIePyTCvXH3JDPXc7U=
Received: by filter0361p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0361p1iad2-16534-5C176E5E-10 2018-12-17 09:37:34.497129759 +0000 UTC m=+299663.897193378
Received: from github-lowworker-e711880.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.45]) by ismtpd0007p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id 4YByj8n2Q7KHsW_Lr3fMAQ for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 09:37:34.330 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-e711880.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC6A440DE7 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2018 01:37:34 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 09:37:34 +0000
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab27b6cfb6110f4ddbc68e0fc0a40a7cbbcbe3dffb92cf00000001182f305e92a169ce174df843@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2184/447779943@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2184@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2184@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] kInitialRtt of 100 msec is too aggressive (#2184)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c176e5e4e3dd_62f93ff8a22d45bc107932"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0y2onc/9ns5VrW05ilqLFV7L+AGsqhfqROIp S6YyVaUa7exAPlyqSk50YNIVAbhrmCNX911/+QioKVMzdVPkryiCOYIQGksuf9/DqMPuODjTnN1fJI D5RZkauVa2iXk2Nt7ZA/wJh4VuKjgukZRNiit2BpBRsRBQ/N/LaI+46r4OUpkU2lU6l7hElrXGYb+L s=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/yjZ6IpjfZHEm9Amf-t5DbvmUhIQ>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 09:37:37 -0000

I'd suggest increasing slightly above 100ms because US - Europe will hover between 101 - 150 ms, unless we want to almost always retransmit the Initial packet defensively on non regional links, which kind of makes sense.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2184#issuecomment-447779943

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email