Q and L loss bits: which is which?
Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com> Tue, 19 November 2019 14:32 UTC
Return-Path: <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D307120934 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:32:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hUAgn2OQFCC6 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:32:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x832.google.com (mail-qt1-x832.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::832]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F24601200B1 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:32:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x832.google.com with SMTP id r20so24737705qtp.13 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:32:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:mime-version :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=eOBDoCw1ux/stOgnbE7riNx4dhTdeTaMBDt8DrzyrZ4=; b=XknWf3JUgYcRJ//uIGzTZgkp9Bo7kd0lN1kWyGUf9rTbeCOa/4Wx8gYkx1IzrC0UyB lHkLacYgOhbBfsWcMly9bqT84bXJUUgFHPEjjc7UMNp2WHyfFW5bm1YgEWyrEalr9B1H D+ivI5je0ajk9Mxei5FafItCsSj8of9JR8H3XmUS8RN066FazECOG9kvkzNCBiULOo3W OPzXZYfCPw4k7hQK97pxRfFrBPD+qMGkBGWaUF3yIf0fO5l0ccQnwdXFk/KTtPTyGzvp aReiRFUaQa+g5IMHO00k6HKuSxAkdgul0lveDgTFpQ4qrMNK3E7i8/C3DIzUzmYW5Jke 8uLA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :mime-version:content-disposition:user-agent; bh=eOBDoCw1ux/stOgnbE7riNx4dhTdeTaMBDt8DrzyrZ4=; b=chonvhSkW2X3Ky/1WTJIBOniXo3KtkWuQ5v9+tmd/labW3Wq0/oyEeDHvHmsAs1H9q k6h9Xdd1i1C4TavZC6+tNBGTA6sDWNDsorpVYKpH9FHo4TP+wllLQui3qVRXDkJ24NLl LoEcHy0p4akvujI8ZQndbYLhQISzmSeedwhpeKXZoeEVCqmgLNLyKwMWHbdYWSa8g6yc ggZxBfiRWOJIA37Ilk5pTrSBfjQqVuq8dn7tr1/NP18PCLW9GjpkXIOuonrTMQZ8GLVN WxFQAsAoavuBqb9MUE6yjrmfNdlyY1lZdzlMtG8EmkPvgBqdf6VbAmeudaMaNFfi3aa9 nsHQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU8nuXjbNHSAkZP9FE4Dj9EGqxbSC5s6Qm7PeYeuKZPhESweoGG MI8b5Sy/eeXpbYIbT53W2jkhIf3+ypk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwRhmlWIuFWV3uWzctrxPiAxOdDOfViFNSdsmtW+wcP/dBznUMdWMHZII+SR5XdGrvoQtohPQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:6bd9:: with SMTP id b25mr29269859qtt.295.1574173943866; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:32:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ubuntu-dmitri (ool-2f1636b6.static.optonline.net. [47.22.54.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z17sm11595959qtq.69.2019.11.19.06.32.23 for <quic@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:32:23 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 09:32:19 -0500
From: Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
To: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Subject: Q and L loss bits: which is which?
Message-ID: <20191119143218.GB2789@ubuntu-dmitri>
Mail-Followup-To: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/0qmVseFECOibQwgNYXGyJWNBy0Y>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:32:27 -0000
Hello, I've read the loss bits draft [1] and the basic functionality (a single counter per connection, ignoring the per-CID or per-tuple nuances) is very doable. I can set up a separate public endpoint that generates these bits for experimentation. One stumbling block is that the draft does not specify which short header R bit [2] is L and which is Q. - Dmitri. 1. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ferrieuxhamchaoui-quic-lossbits-02 2. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-transport-24#section-17.3
- Q and L loss bits: which is which? Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: Q and L loss bits: which is which? alexandre.ferrieux
- Re: Q and L loss bits: which is which? Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: Q and L loss bits: which is which? alexandre.ferrieux
- Re: Q and L loss bits: which is which? Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: Q and L loss bits: which is which? Christian Huitema
- RE: Q and L loss bits: which is which? Lubashev, Igor
- Re: Q and L loss bits: which is which? Brian Trammell (IETF)
- Re: Q and L loss bits: which is which? alexandre.ferrieux
- Re: Q and L loss bits: which is which? Christian Huitema
- RE: Q and L loss bits: which is which? Lubashev, Igor
- Re: Q and L loss bits: which is which? Dmitri Tikhonov
- RE: Q and L loss bits: which is which? Lubashev, Igor
- CONEX? (was: Re: Q and L loss bits) Lars Eggert
- Re: CONEX? (was: Re: Q and L loss bits) Brian Trammell (IETF)
- RE: CONEX? (was: Re: Q and L loss bits) Lubashev, Igor
- Re: CONEX? (was: Re: Q and L loss bits) Brian Trammell (IETF)
- Re: CONEX? (was: Re: Q and L loss bits) alexandre.ferrieux