Re: Dealing with Design issues following Last Call
Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com> Tue, 22 December 2020 15:17 UTC
Return-Path: <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07833A1102 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 07:17:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.801
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.801 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LhPrbvcVyJNz for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 07:17:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82f.google.com (mail-qt1-x82f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6FBC3A1101 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 07:17:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82f.google.com with SMTP id z3so9116784qtw.9 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 07:17:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=CMQJiZl02Z4ChGQ5feeQ7Bch50ua79NiKqP1AAwtq+U=; b=N2VIGCQdEhdJ48cD1SLmyz67MNRdg8J1SstctFzYrdI/ENLMAE/XpGE0TPsG5I+DgH q5Y0x3GUtfheqvCzKkIyperdEbZHfTGlfhmPXA77U4G6wD4DUCTWJvrJrkXjdXPNRaVR XlFYilCKzgsOCK9BizUtNuGVGu7+biKLJcNI06TC4au55awsWIBTqn5KTCEPf8mTg7Ss b4dxVrwOWuVY0mycwqc9SRWfCmnzbmm4KDKxf0tiK61pj9amutmaUZe+mwkNCXxvpfUA Qf5zZFuC3TecdZZ/TVxHVs/X9yZYtMGWaWp/iKq3LBKbxvpxVVCwFt8jkZ9Y3h2g5lOY 5TPg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=CMQJiZl02Z4ChGQ5feeQ7Bch50ua79NiKqP1AAwtq+U=; b=XhsIdtE0JBu1hqjZddpaQNv9zuu8MrLm9jjoHM54fp/toYwM+YCTO13lvSH31kquFz 4qF2uXsmX1i70Spy4wNfBAqsK+sW1Q6fRUhuPZBzplFNtF7W1oTdRlRsW5ju9X/s3OPV 660vQDAa8hvneJ8Zcd1N7bAFT0W0AgreUYhfKxbW86F/MgxHJBsImjCIMyWnO/2CiRDZ bnXk4DSrlQoqRqSkQ/Dwaq5aPS9/dHweQk2uCsYvgQVDLV/vRkgGTvICcO7qbLT1faWI G6EWfbEcA60GldbqV86bBDbBf35E6FV2v9XF/+2AcoFGajdKzfG2Z+9HqwveE2HhqOQR yadQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531IF2hsuRyTEoDJc6uY9saKCyzW+q5HnxhDjx05bZnM3kneB1CZ 7Q0wuXgrYHcig3/SP/W9o0hoMoi5sm/zHw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwwzBajFBPj4otTWQH9hOLTDspQc7A0mI8+31VUpxX9osT2wdKA3OWhyiFoTXFzXk50O/02ng==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5745:: with SMTP id 5mr21312069qtx.131.1608650224261; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 07:17:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from okhta (ool-44c1d219.dyn.optonline.net. [68.193.210.25]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w33sm11660774qth.34.2020.12.22.07.17.02 for <quic@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 22 Dec 2020 07:17:03 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 10:17:01 -0500
From: Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Dealing with Design issues following Last Call
Message-ID: <20201222151701.GB115125@okhta>
Mail-Followup-To: quic@ietf.org
References: <CALGR9oaAfy0jj=mqX1tiuKdE=Kk=mRHgv15pUUM1XHBMovkw4Q@mail.gmail.com> <20201218201131.GB34756@okhta> <CALGR9oZ13gFRjZERT9z6tEXZY+mxwncpiyPzwCuqK+BJemE98w@mail.gmail.com> <20201218205736.GC34756@okhta> <CACpbDcddQ9p6p9c8b3kEf5z8o+pnswicmJhNVhVJbOCmJSWk6g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACpbDcddQ9p6p9c8b3kEf5z8o+pnswicmJhNVhVJbOCmJSWk6g@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/3RWxWLQnwJCrRTvhLwd9Xb0Pd8o>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 15:17:07 -0000
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 06:34:23PM -0800, Jana Iyengar wrote: > > > > I am trying to prevent a situation where IESG approves -33 on one day and > > the RFC is published two days later and we do not have the changes > > > > https://media.giphy.com/media/H7ZafI4jatlyht8Tst/giphy.gif I don't believe I've seen this sitcom. - Dmitri.
- Dealing with Design issues following Last Call Lucas Pardue
- Re: Dealing with Design issues following Last Call Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: Dealing with Design issues following Last Call Lucas Pardue
- Re: Dealing with Design issues following Last Call Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: Dealing with Design issues following Last Call Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: Dealing with Design issues following Last Call Christian Huitema
- Re: Dealing with Design issues following Last Call Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: Dealing with Design issues following Last Call Jana Iyengar
- Re: Dealing with Design issues following Last Call Lars Eggert
- Re: Dealing with Design issues following Last Call Dmitri Tikhonov