Re: Fwd: TSVAREA agenda for IETF-106

Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <> Tue, 12 November 2019 13:19 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE781200DB for <>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 05:19:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.996
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pyEMs9XZXAU4 for <>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 05:19:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1528112002E for <>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 05:19:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id a21so14869917edj.8 for <>; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 05:19:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=M8W956sIkDbuMuImUTi9V8uFM5NCQ/YI3OR8B0hc9JU=; b=Sjoanft4pRuBHk9NsEXhTzE8tccVg5G1vRMSstyun4ifBgfXAWVKJitraE9Yez3zE2 pebmWoM+egthWffVwz+TXXZ80WF5x5eWN9jmQazldF5F25Rr24O0g8blTI9G9ZKysiB+ 7h4vNVhfnlOJQjn2r6ZPaIQTFd8W7CL2zps+WOp1X1ILES3lBnDX4K7uCURytCGVHq1E LoW6crM3q9ziRIxilA4uVGNvTlbj6obhOXoYxtPKOSqGHNuUbyUMbUc6+Mdy0KkvpscH uQleciVDbcQ1Knp6k+1OkuZkhkB15JjCsmDnbeMEoepT0i6USakSRsHIq23gdkdP8sTG hCnQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=M8W956sIkDbuMuImUTi9V8uFM5NCQ/YI3OR8B0hc9JU=; b=edithoR2wMb9h6L4EDl7ENjKAIzOM9FaWQYwbX28/R311/6vY7xQPIipxRdZe3wZ0m isjFVXw0Fhdc25Fu/RJh/gPUamBaxpfVusefJ1GYbLR9kF4WupVDBm0vLXIf00rWGc6p Ia1Zojmcp6EEg3uSKoUGMN3mzOGwMZNNumfo5ZnoeRBt4PTL9JLbR3U2lJjuLWRfsAf8 /n/g/BN8Gzxa5RiJf5EzITcXjpcONj2SxqcxGG6wmqb5sRRqMu6ZzJgBCmX3WGiRMsg8 PsA/XltwLxni3Gv1HJh92HTsXo4WnvrB6RndS8M3fMW1e+Q2HFdmHDSQeNefNuqNnRJW 7OjA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXhlmIsDjl30ojRz6oKdGg6xsDu+ZquwvQj72oaqX/oe0qdHbZu lNBt3h3Hlx0m0wctSm0dAwbyzs4VSwi0x7yopCXNtBn5
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyoHTXi0b+BfST3HXD1f3SKNKorLT+wZqigzvDEhEkWhsJztB4hfmbk2SHa/3n6EAol8fYcmdq5PDtKMuj5M88=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:488:: with SMTP id k8mr32530366edv.293.1573564756598; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 05:19:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by with HTTPREST; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 14:19:15 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Mikkel_Fahn=C3=B8e_J=C3=B8rgensen?= <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <>
X-Mailer: Airmail (420)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 14:19:15 +0100
Message-ID: <>
Subject: Re: Fwd: TSVAREA agenda for IETF-106
To: Lars Eggert <>, QUIC IETF mailing list <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005922b6059726189e"
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:19:22 -0000

After fast read through the document I am a bit concerned about the
proposed search algorithm: chose a set of sizes to progressively inspect
until MAX is accepted or a black hole is detected.

Another search pattern would be to use exponential search where gaps become
increasingly larger, but when a black hole is detected, smaller sizes are
tested by choosing a probe size between the smallest known black hole and
the larges known valid packet size, rather than stopping immediately after
first black hole.

Kind Regards,
Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen

On 12 November 2019 at 13.54.32, Lars Eggert ( wrote:

Note that there will be chunk of time dedicated in TSVAREA to discuss how
the IETF might want to split up future work on QUIC application bindings
and QUIC extensions and maintenance into existing and new WGs.


> Begin forwarded message:
> From: Mirja Kuehlewind <>
> Subject: TSVAREA agenda for IETF-106
> Date: November 12, 2019 at 14:46:43 GMT+2
> To:
> Hi all,
> The agenda for our next tsvarea meeting is online (actually since
beginning of last week already):
> We only have a short slot but will take some time to discuss new work
topics related to QUIC. The TSV ADs will meeting before the session with
the ART ADs and QUIC chairs and we should be able to report back for that.
> See you soon in Singapore or remotely!
> Mirja and Margnus (from remote)