Difference between V1 and exprimental.

"Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com> Thu, 22 March 2018 11:38 UTC

Return-Path: <roni.even@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E6012420B for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 04:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VmUsnYavLIwe for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 04:38:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D4F8120721 for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 04:38:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id CD416BA5BBB7B for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:38:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEMM401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.209) by lhreml705-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.382.0; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:38:29 +0000
Received: from DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.214]) by DGGEMM401-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.209]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 19:38:08 +0800
From: "Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com>
To: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Subject: Difference between V1 and exprimental.
Thread-Topic: Difference between V1 and exprimental.
Thread-Index: AdPB0f3huQOx3x3kQAGgk1bJ69kRDg==
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:38:08 +0000
Message-ID: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD86E361@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.86.95]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD86E361DGGEMM506MBXchina_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/4DNfQuojVftXIT5ZY8-9eAuY2bI>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:38:33 -0000

Hi,
My view about the difference is that having it in V1 will allow standard bodies that define network architecture can specify the spin bit/s in their network management solution (3GPP, Broad Band Forum,...)
Roni Even