Re: Draft time stamps for Quic
Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com> Tue, 25 February 2020 13:30 UTC
Return-Path: <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23FBC3A0CA5 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 05:30:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DnaqFlFgRW9G for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 05:30:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x729.google.com (mail-qk1-x729.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::729]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 587023A0CA8 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 05:30:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x729.google.com with SMTP id m9so6646666qke.4 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 05:30:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=x3cgTOZ930YmoorZsiTRSmdjp1XL+KxBWj75/JPbbqQ=; b=YeZRiwsMH4oQfe5tkDRncj4c6/5i+UgxqaZJXJzLF+enjx+pLa//GiWGhJ1WBZhxLA 03HPAWnXUEEu0H2NG25CuWIGAaI9+eBaoKaRdOmKvQ4BQZlPsx6cPOZQTkhfjhN473be DsxQ5ODwPL0seGT8j2Wr/T7fME/wSzivOR1hXHqTQkziWI29Q7YqTCOj0t2A12bzGzsc xXkXsb8Zn+UJsQ0N6Pcx5eJr2OamG3mRpzidH5FtPlqYjbrCpcDTOnUDe5uL0XUjk/qg E14Yk+XIgB4POHrxS8JGGpz1ikz/7cIm8OXrwyNVebwwY9doBP5wLUGiRlof4qyoiIdm bmLg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=x3cgTOZ930YmoorZsiTRSmdjp1XL+KxBWj75/JPbbqQ=; b=JMpUAUFY0yUwfNl12/xmCsM6DHv8hPOI07rxgYpkadh2w55SWQAU0W0xrSb8vT7SOV TOzTuQc5fxmq5o7zO0XzGSrjH/sH/zA4lZ5yu3pjmI2+JEALYlKNu2lPllwGP3xD6iia JAVZXKFCJoO1TauodkDqYltqIbgdrZvEyr7XIo7D85rSjzCF3Ugi5m7URVdJqvcIa8Ro wlkFzG/x1gl5ZWWcPm65WwID4yze1gnNv90Hrb/k/L/B+CUc7uRVZRxX34i1MQ6REb3B 5350qB4My1GcBCtmxgBuaIABHNIDC/zZe3hhLJzn5dlCJOC26VmD1IWehhrXhceoypUz Rrtw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWB9X93F/AGmjXVOchCKCwZfvTL6DOiyI0NPwMDTOmz0XG9bV1S 2xvOvpwq1/8QSGX692fVuLpt8s2eq6o=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxCNwYfvbuhMjDCPKymMyZ4HPNS4MLH8wuritqOklii1kz1cVieoCSBPe8o3Y24wpyhxMmAOQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:dc82:: with SMTP id q124mr56159340qkf.20.1582637415248; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 05:30:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ubuntu-dmitri (ool-2f1636b6.static.optonline.net. [47.22.54.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w53sm7568648qtb.91.2020.02.25.05.30.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 05:30:14 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 08:30:09 -0500
From: Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Cc: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Draft time stamps for Quic
Message-ID: <20200225133008.GA6299@ubuntu-dmitri>
Mail-Followup-To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
References: <158261032173.24275.11527026977274904601.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <450bf28f-04a0-9bb4-e01e-471767b02e75@huitema.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <450bf28f-04a0-9bb4-e01e-471767b02e75@huitema.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/8eQzYG7UkLvSG4kB9nt2Xv11yh4>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 13:30:18 -0000
Great, this is a much lower barrier to entry than modifying the ACK frame! How is "the beginning of the connection" defined? Is it as follows: - for the client, the time when the first Initial packet is sent; - for the server, the time when the first Initial packet is received. - Dmitri. On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:05:44PM -0800, Christian Huitema wrote: > After I submitted draft-huitema-quic-1wd-00, we started a discussion on > the possibility to compose extensions. The obvious way to do that is to > define a "time stamp" frame instead of modifying the ACK frame. As long > as both are in the same packet, we get the same measurements. The added > benefit is that time stamps could be composed with other frames too -- > such as for example path responses, to measure one way delays when > evaluating multiple migration options. > > -- Christian Huitema > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-huitema-quic-ts-00.txt > Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 21:58:41 -0800 > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org > To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> > > > > > A new version of I-D, draft-huitema-quic-ts-00.txt > has been successfully submitted by Christian Huitema and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-huitema-quic-ts > Revision: 00 > Title: Quic Timestamps For Measuring One-Way Delays > Document date: 2020-02-24 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 6 > URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-huitema-quic-ts-00.txt > Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-huitema-quic-ts/ > Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huitema-quic-ts-00 > Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-huitema-quic-ts > > > Abstract: > The TimeStamp frame can be added to Quic packets when one way delay > measurements is useful. The timestamp is set to the number of > microseconds from the beginning of the connection to the time at > which the packet is sent. The draft defines the "enable_time_stamp" > transport parameter for negotiating the use of this extension frame, > and a new frame types for the time_stamped frame. > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > The IETF Secretariat > >
- Draft time stamps for Quic Christian Huitema
- Re: Draft time stamps for Quic Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: Draft time stamps for Quic Christian Huitema
- Re: Draft time stamps for Quic Watson Ladd
- Re: Draft time stamps for Quic Tal Mizrahi
- Re: Draft time stamps for Quic Christian Huitema