Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 22 November 2020 07:33 UTC

Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3949C3A11F8 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 23:33:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=l/+2j8bI; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=BLt5/+aQ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0PyEd5t2-JlF for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 23:32:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCEDF3A11F6 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 23:32:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20C7769 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 02:32:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 22 Nov 2020 02:32:56 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date; s= fm1; bh=ZeMfSSG47CJPOxAvaEaVEL2sxBngSAnvNDe2HDdRZpE=; b=l/+2j8bI +ujr++HBRLQgtSv3d86LmZqw3SfGQuhpRLbjqnMSccxog7P6f4Y6mzkCdMQ3HyJM g20DypfBwD3DxBkHJlRUy7AHjJDpwNqvCZXZY8hppLEKpP08oHe2Ueg39QfqcjJC 6/qKMWLdGZzbgJ6MJmD0HD5T560QnBgBkTIRl8qLjRHW9wd4TfqK4mNZigE3JCJe vfDhtAEOse3gBHRf/w/fXZ9esWLrCDGy6O27WJAYHKhgBZGxpi1Q9O9hmIQIzrEz uIN5UAKdjoPkQLfnxCW1COkkUZ8XQlZChK7NcAU9vYW/BjGxqVSIz2QYEJXA9nJF 57CmxaPmKmE7Pw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=ZeMfSSG47CJPOxAvaEaVEL2sxBngS AnvNDe2HDdRZpE=; b=BLt5/+aQvtJFYuhTdb9/lxrIhusve49ZfMvLm+jkdL0QA MJ1lOuW5VTZVkOxS3vjrky1pcCLXcsMrCQE5hvbjaeR/BvUIklwsv//LcPUHiHxU Rsol5gxflr0KSymbro/k9tRfVRyeT5zSivOKJ1K25Se3MPBPVlFpU9psPBH1aXo3 Zk5sDhEZkxOiaPGORdV4pWSG6YdVIn1ZYFWC6pdkfsf1bsrD9E8cKZBMBwLsSkav ltXCsULfqnjAsyRHlZ6gxApH70lkKr4cYEJv/b4KNobSt6W7MxAAJVdOSPVnbVp7 uXkGcObWbM+0lxJJHhRLTfp6MW86ah5nARITJWaMA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:JxS6XzgFIHz_oMnXN0iCGf7U6ThxtKDJc85MknsiZqz1TdVe3CDQBw> <xme:JxS6XwCl6EW2PjlGsFqC4TmwoHg_Op-sAD79FmZmdeubmaExJL2r2tKsURdHa2fQr w8toTelVfOnvb8bQQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudegfedguddutdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtje enucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhihucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicu uehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeugfefhfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudei teenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecukfhppeehvddrudeijedrudeivd druddtjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedunecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhm peguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:JxS6XzGZrNto_t1KFeeU3vL5fD1x5S3cRVuGjNBBHojj_i6wsJNhew> <xmx:JxS6XwSsLpb96DHxAMQujfSaTT_FZnQ9PLtDzUUyi80l_0NqI5HpfA> <xmx:JxS6XwyaXigcDKeBR4f5B7k-VsmUjGbYDOMhGzm_yG_ydMfe0e4w6g> <xmx:KBS6X9qzxcwGUEpA9ZsVb8UCR86SI-8WF01C-EwojWi1oqt_I6lSzw>
Received: from fv-az12-368.internal.cloudapp.net (unknown [52.167.162.107]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B317B3064AAA for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 02:32:55 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============0883690205409967078=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Message-Id: <20201122073255.B317B3064AAA@mailuser.nyi.internal>
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 02:32:55 -0500
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/9mQgJS1tQiADxi9l0Ryh-7i19cE>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 07:33:01 -0000



Events without label "editorial"

Issues
------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+9/-13/💬31)
  9 issues created:
  - secdir review of -qpack; issue 3 (by larseggert)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4401 [-qpack] [ietf-lc] 
  - secdir review of -qpack; issue 2 (by larseggert)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4400 [-qpack] [ietf-lc] 
  - secdir review of -qpack; issue 11 (by larseggert)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4399 [-qpack] [ietf-lc] 
  - "1-RTT packet" is defined nowhere (by kazuho)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4397 
  - Must small VN packets be dropped? (by RyanTheOptimist)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4395 
  - Idempotency and replay (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4393 [-tls] 
  - Reserve fewer codepoints for greasing (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4387 [-http] [-transport] [ietf-lc] 
  - opsdir review of -transport (by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4386 [-transport] [ietf-lc] 
  - Transport: IANA section inconsistency regarding 0-63 range for 62-bit values (by gloinul)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4385 

  18 issues received 31 new comments:
  - #4400 secdir review of -qpack; issue 2 (2 by MikeBishop, martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4400 [-qpack] [ietf-lc] 
  - #4395 Must small VN packets be dropped? (3 by DavidSchinazi, kazuho)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4395 [-tls] [ietf-lc] 
  - #4382 genart review of -qpack (1 by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4382 [-qpack] [ietf-lc] 
  - #4379 IANA review of -transport; question 4 (3 by MikeBishop, gloinul)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4379 [-transport] [ietf-lc] 
  - #4378 IANA review of -transport; question 3 (2 by gloinul, martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4378 [-transport] [ietf-lc] 
  - #4377 IANA review of -transport; question 2 (2 by MikeBishop, martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4377 [-transport] [ietf-lc] 
  - #4376 IANA review of -transport; question 1 (3 by gloinul, martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4376 [-transport] [ietf-lc] 
  - #4375 IANA review of -http; overall correctness (1 by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4375 [-http] [ietf-lc] 
  - #4372 IANA review of -http; question 2 (1 by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4372 [-http] [ietf-lc] 
  - #4371 IANA review of -http; question 1 (3 by MikeBishop, gloinul, martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4371 [-http] 
  - #4370 IANA review of -qpack (1 by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4370 [-qpack] [ietf-lc] 
  - #4366 IANA review of -invariants (1 by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4366 [-invariants] [ietf-lc] 
  - #4364 Integrity of the data isn't mentioned at all (1 by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4364 [-http] [ietf-lc] 
  - #4358 HTTP/3 stream types and extensibility (1 by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4358 [-http] [ietf-lc] 
  - #4352 HTTP concepts of error codes (1 by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4352 [-http] [ietf-lc] 
  - #4350 Should connections be disconnected on malformed Initial packets? (2 by kazu-yamamoto, martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4350 [-transport] [ietf-lc] 
  - #4349 HTTP/3 reserved stream practical credits (2 by LPardue, MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4349 [-http] [ietf-lc] 
  - #4280 No IANA version registry (1 by mjoras)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4280 [-transport] [ietf-lc] 

  13 issues closed:
  - Must small VN packets be dropped? https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4395 [-tls] [ietf-lc] 
  - secdir review of -qpack; issue 2 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4400 [-qpack] [ietf-lc] 
  - IANA review of -transport; question 3 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4378 [-transport] [ietf-lc] 
  - Should connections be disconnected on malformed Initial packets? https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4350 [-transport] [ietf-lc] 
  - Is HTTP CONNECT always TCP? https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4356 [-http] [ietf-lc] 
  - What does "retrying requests is not possible" mean? https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4355 [-http] [ietf-lc] 
  - What is an HTTP hop? https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4354 [-http] [ietf-lc] 
  - What is an HTTP field? https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4353 [-http] [ietf-lc] 
  - Clearly distinguish terms and concepts of QUIC vs. HTTP/3 in all cases https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4351 [-http] [ietf-lc] 
  - transport: error connection of what https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4347 [-transport] [ietf-lc] 
  - opsdir review of -transport https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4386 [-transport] [ietf-lc] 
  - genart review of -qpack https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4382 [-qpack] [ietf-lc] 
  - IANA review of -http; overall correctness https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4375 [-http] [ietf-lc] 

* quicwg/ops-drafts (+6/-2/💬15)
  6 issues created:
  - Normative language in applicability statement (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/139 
  - Critical streams aren't worth a whole paragraph (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/138 
  - You can't close stream ingress (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/137 
  - 2^62-1 is a harder limit than implied (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/136 
  - QoS support and ECMP section (by britram)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/131 
  - CI appears broken (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/130 

  3 issues received 15 new comments:
  - #130 CI appears broken (13 by britram, larseggert, martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/130 
  - #115 connection migration: add server preferred address (1 by britram)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/115 [-applicability] 
  - #85 Double check use of normative language (1 by britram)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/85 [-applicability] [-manageability] [final check] 

  2 issues closed:
  - CI appears broken https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/130 
  - verify all references to QUIC documents https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/100 [-applicability] [-manageability] [final check] 

* quicwg/datagram (+1/-0/💬24)
  1 issues created:
  - Exposing datagram acknowledgements (by kixelated)
    https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/15 

  2 issues received 24 new comments:
  - #15 Exposing datagram acknowledgements (23 by DavidSchinazi, LPardue, Ralith, janaiyengar, kixelated, nibanks, tfpauly)
    https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/15 
  - #8 Text on Datagram's Interaction with Loss Recovery is a bit Light (1 by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/8 

* quicwg/load-balancers (+0/-0/💬1)
  1 issues received 1 new comments:
  - #12 Configuration ID might be too small (1 by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/12 [needs-discussion] 



Pull requests
-------------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+9/-3/💬2)
  9 pull requests submitted:
  - Clarify header protection sampling (by PaulDance)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4404 
  - Clarify labels example in -tls Appendix A.1. (by PaulDance)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4403 
  - Fix readme link to contributing guidelines (by PaulDance)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4402 
  - [editorial] packets aren't number space (by kazuho)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4398 
  - minimum valid packet size is an example (by kazuho)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4396 
  - Idempotent is not the standard for 0-RTT (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4394 [-tls] [design] 
  - Reserve just one value for standards action (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4389 [-transport] [design] 
  - Rework lots of error references (by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4384 
  - Gen-Art Review:  Improve HTTP terminology and references (by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4383 

  2 pull requests received 2 new comments:
  - #4402 Fix readme link to contributing guidelines (1 by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4402 
  - #4389 Reserve just one value for standards action (1 by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4389 [-transport] [design] 

  3 pull requests merged:
  - Fix readme link to contributing guidelines
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4402 
  - Reserve just one value for standards action
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4389 [-transport] [design] 
  - Gen-Art Review:  Improve HTTP terminology and references
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4383 [-http] 

* quicwg/ops-drafts (+5/-1/💬3)
  5 pull requests submitted:
  - Edits, first batch (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/135 
  - Remove QOS support and ECMP (by britram)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/134 
  - Migrate from CircleCI to Github Actions (by britram)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/133 
  - Remove normative language from the drafts (by britram)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/132 
  - Review and fix section references into other QUIC docs. (by britram)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/129 

  2 pull requests received 3 new comments:
  - #135 Edits, first batch (1 by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/135 
  - #132 Remove normative language from the drafts (2 by britram)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/132 

  1 pull requests merged:
  - Migrate from CircleCI to Github Actions
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/133 

* quicwg/load-balancers (+1/-0/💬2)
  1 pull requests submitted:
  - Add ECMP CID algorithm (by ianswett)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/61 

  1 pull requests received 2 new comments:
  - #61 Add ECMP CID algorithm (2 by ianswett, nibanks)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/61 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/datagram
* https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers
* https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation