Martin Duke's Yes on draft-ietf-quic-invariants-12: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke via Datatracker <> Wed, 30 December 2020 06:35 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7900E3A1001; Tue, 29 Dec 2020 22:35:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <>
To: The IESG <>
Subject: Martin Duke's Yes on draft-ietf-quic-invariants-12: (with COMMENT)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.24.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Duke <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 22:35:47 -0800
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 06:35:48 -0000

Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-quic-invariants-12: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


Due to the discussion in quic-transport, some of the description of the VN
packet here may turn out to be misleading (as “supported versions” fields may
be used for other things). We should reevaluate once that is resolved.

Again, the use of “off-path attacker” in sec 7 is inconsistent with the other