Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 28 March 2021 07:42 UTC

Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10CFF3A1006 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 00:42:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=tGOHwYdS; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=QOUNl4EG
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UET-VGZOqnr1 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 00:42:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A10823A0FFA for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 00:42:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0680A5C0078 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 03:42:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 28 Mar 2021 03:42:17 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date; s= fm2; bh=qRwjblwy3BX6FqPF+yfP5QkvqFmFiXwptMw9b5qzFIU=; b=tGOHwYdS ay6RUknbx2AR6KdOhFSDw8RTJVQ66pjL3BSU8y+KSCre1zZ3ZnMnfE3CS0mM1hrQ HI7voiy03s/36v7KCjbV9mTxvs64OD+lWXsRvJjYRsEYE9vsyuMkGSfJRujYQX+Y CD6WPyW3D4GaysSYbPdj8zhF1BrQMc2d2t5nqzqk22Eo15LA1MhERbmOmRfiRNIQ X5BHjRuoZa/tVVen1OXuMg00NaQXI0X9nbCo7ZX/0lKK5FyVpubuGcd+VMW8klTu XGnyrrXSj4ULJIJaDxG8IFe2Znn7c7WL46kf0N9tEleZ2n+CGrc930nbO+2wcZbP YEGmUg4iLpCygw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=qRwjblwy3BX6FqPF+yfP5QkvqFmFi XwptMw9b5qzFIU=; b=QOUNl4EGShQi8XBymVnOkuDhV9ZHSE4m9w3mcO9NUmW9+ xbLl/Q+FAw/5eFMKh9LmirKxXPSXMcSC22znHkEqphyooTRXwlCSFifXDQtj6ag7 VH5Gn4I5DjLYKkUq8ZFJG1WrZRr5NWFQ+JhIYt6PRHE6N7M43Qu3W1XrGYOQTVBa 1rEp+K7SWJddIX6fUnJTolCDWIxnIfaVm+5nxxuHKfgnLXjYyl5pq1chHA5ZmIFA HfzJDIHMIf+EXE3TfwUuMUCBMhaloAL50Ic4KZXJEyah+nFiJ/+2h7ureWLBqNq9 o1F9jGbjfczJw3jWdjBO+jIHS+H0oTPQSGQVXn0xg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:WDNgYF_VORiXNNSGaaCgONTVryJ0uTMEu5Q25z8nkOyOkDRWxnLiYg> <xme:WDNgYJtP3aMjLpwM9UH82nANvuZ65yKiAN0EzZgtxs-GWOqGHfh7XAv4x01Vz0d7Z rCF7qix5ol2R9bStQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudehhedguddutdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtje enucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhihucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicu uehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeugfefhfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudei teenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecukfhppeehvddrudeijedrudeivd drjeefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepudenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep ughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:WDNgYDB_BF8NeHaFYQ9kCNua-RJ7gUnlWH4HCsX0usoEuv5DOBEX0Q> <xmx:WDNgYJezUqTVdXfWGcQ8RwLHz5Eu9r6NlHG1S9XpVeLqOguCPt8Rmg> <xmx:WDNgYKPlBwLbkOQmmJkAh4Jf_YdsCm0dKHsIJcLYWrU_B6k_5HT26Q> <xmx:WTNgYM36XWVU4LQFzwiSyNmaXvqLDr-uOy3zM-zSvsjj1OZU-4MV_A>
Received: from fv-az186-764.internal.cloudapp.net (unknown [52.167.162.73]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C6A1D24005B for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 03:42:16 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============3611360759385002847=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Message-Id: <20210328074216.C6A1D24005B@mailuser.nyi.internal>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 03:42:16 -0400 (EDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/Lrj64WlQLwYfEVd82MagI0DiWWI>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 07:42:24 -0000



Events without label "editorial"

Issues
------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+1/-0/💬10)
  1 issues created:
  - Transport: Receiver/sender wording for MAX_STREAMS (by WesleyRosenblum)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4849 

  4 issues received 10 new comments:
  - #4849 Transport: Receiver/sender wording for MAX_STREAMS (2 by WesleyRosenblum, ianswett)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4849 [-transport] 
  - #4847 Recovery: Reset the Initial congestion window when loss is observed during handshake (5 by ianswett, martinthomson, pravb)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4847 [-recovery] 
  - #4846 Loss recovery pseudocode can erroneously set PTO in the past (2 by Ralith, ianswett)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4846 [-recovery] 
  - #4836 Revert Spurious Congestion Event (1 by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4836 [-bis] [-recovery] 

* quicwg/ops-drafts (+2/-1/💬6)
  2 issues created:
  - Merge sections 4.5 (Filtering Behavior) and 4.6 (UDP Policing) (by britram)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/301 
  - Better discuss the nuance between transport error codes and application error codes (by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/297 

  5 issues received 6 new comments:
  - #293 Stronger caution on using CID (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/293 [-manageability] [UDP Filtering] 
  - #292 Applicability could say more about ALPN (2 by LPardue, MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/292 [-applicability] [editor-ready] 
  - #290 draft-ietf-quic-manageability-10 Feedback 4.5 (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/290 [-manageability] [UDP Filtering] 
  - #278 Do we need to say more about padding and DPLPMTUD in manageability? (1 by britram)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/278 [-manageability] 
  - #204 App: Ref: Transport BEHAVE Specs (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/204 [-applicability] [NAT section] [meeting-agenda] 

  1 issues closed:
  - Do we need to say more about padding and DPLPMTUD in manageability? https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/278 [-manageability] 

* quicwg/load-balancers (+1/-0/💬0)
  1 issues created:
  - Applicability to DTLS 1.3 (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/105 



Pull requests
-------------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+1/-0/💬2)
  1 pull requests submitted:
  - Use ACK-eliciting packets in flight to identify anti-deadlock probes (by Ralith)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4848 

  1 pull requests received 2 new comments:
  - #4848 Use ACK-eliciting packets in flight to identify anti-deadlock probes (2 by Ralith)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4848 

* quicwg/ops-drafts (+10/-1/💬2)
  10 pull requests submitted:
  - Reference cleanup (by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/308 
  - Additional text on problem with 4-tuple for stateful devices (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/307 
  - Make recommendation to not CID for NAT stronger (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/306 
  - Update on UDP policing section (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/305 
  - add reference to draft-ietf-quic-version-negotiation (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/304 
  - add reference to draft-ietf-httpbis-priority instead H2 (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/303 
  - More ALPN discussion (by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/302 
  - Rewrite Stateful Treatment section (by britram)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/300 
  - Try to make flow control consuming and processing crisper (by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/299 
  - Split Connection Closure discussion into two parts (by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/298 

  2 pull requests received 2 new comments:
  - #300 Rewrite Stateful Treatment section (1 by britram)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/300 
  - #299 Try to make flow control consuming and processing crisper (1 by gorryfair)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/299 

  1 pull requests merged:
  - Clarify routing stability requirement
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/214 [-manageability] [next revision] 

* quicwg/load-balancers (+1/-0/💬2)
  1 pull requests submitted:
  - Dtls (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/106 

  1 pull requests received 2 new comments:
  - #106 Dtls (2 by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/106 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/datagram
* https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers
* https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation