Comment on draft-aboba-avtcore-quic-multiplexing - SHIM byte
Roni Even <roni.even@huawei.com> Wed, 01 November 2017 06:50 UTC
Return-Path: <roni.even@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE58C13FDFD for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 23:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oiy3OU48gAtz for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 23:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EB5413F8CD for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Oct 2017 23:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DZB20280; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 06:50:12 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEMM405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.213) by lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 06:50:12 +0000
Received: from DGGEMM506-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.18]) by DGGEMM405-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.213]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 14:50:09 +0800
From: Roni Even <roni.even@huawei.com>
To: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Subject: Comment on draft-aboba-avtcore-quic-multiplexing - SHIM byte
Thread-Topic: Comment on draft-aboba-avtcore-quic-multiplexing - SHIM byte
Thread-Index: AdNS3akbOK6F+T0JQWy2vKDLbmEvow==
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 06:50:09 +0000
Message-ID: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD82A68C@DGGEMM506-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.200.202.65]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD82A68CDGGEMM506MBSchina_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020201.59F96EA5.0029, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.4.18, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 5efdde1dfe1ddf76a57ee3708a290872
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/Qa36JpmKN-SUoldUtMMWSjJInEk>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 06:50:16 -0000
Hi, I think that the proposal to add a SHIM byte in section 2.2 can be described as making QUIC first byte as a two bytes allowing more flexibility noticing other requests for bits in the first byte. Roni