IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Towards a Scalable Modular QUIC Server

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Tue, 22 August 2017 00:18 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E5E132AE9 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37tzq2wb3ZKb for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx143.netapp.com (mx143.netapp.com [216.240.21.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1930B132AD9 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,410,1498546800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="212635703"
Received: from hioexcmbx03-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.36]) by mx143-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 21 Aug 2017 16:49:30 -0700
Received: from VMWEXCCAS05-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.21) by hioexcmbx03-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:13:38 -0700
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (10.120.60.153) by VMWEXCCAS05-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 17:13:38 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-netapp-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=dKTHOMDE6vOlyXgmqYKjcujwhQMBhGQe3hqddd0+akQ=; b=ktox5tchtpDBMW7LJ6Yzjdyru9sA+nQwd+D70I4BJV6NgyZsbGwoy/mxj6bGB31u11723JIGTMl13W2TRhKjD3tZB4gLrP/hz9k8AiwjlMgaOPHaVKRfEdlAdK6ZKqkJDP0NmTcTfJRVroPWop53550TFpl6OG3oIux8rnqJhzE=
Received: from BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.150) by BLUPR06MB179.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.190.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.1.1362.18; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:13:37 +0000
Received: from BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.150]) by BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.150]) with mapi id 15.01.1362.019; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:13:36 +0000
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
CC: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Towards a Scalable Modular QUIC Server
Thread-Topic: Towards a Scalable Modular QUIC Server
Thread-Index: AQHTGrGdxY6rwbYzl0+5SsqL/mKzc6KPf7cAgAAB4gA=
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:13:36 +0000
Message-ID: <B66C97F6-B311-4D0C-A746-0F6D75DDA1A8@netapp.com>
References: <8BDD717E-76DE-4C58-A242-C24DFFADEA8E@netapp.com> <CABkgnnXgENPEYwJHS8KAvquC98jhzx6goDOqbDjh5vsvG6_u7g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXgENPEYwJHS8KAvquC98jhzx6goDOqbDjh5vsvG6_u7g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=lars@netapp.com;
x-originating-ip: [2607:f010:2e9:17:c10a:5918:1a07:cbaa]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR06MB179; 6:IKinQydtWsUYUX/uQFg/ecelQ1ehELeX7EOihO8N6iyIdX7VsOQy4Oxr6PvOHKjg/MpferI44tBbUwmNMfPyy9CS5+9zdfBqltaY2ces2luYBEjqHmM43JnzRNTpQce/L1K1pVpXvNDaZBJNStfMahor8gw118nNYW1cFECpeMgZm5lp+jC7E6bV8ehAEsknIaRDu4vHv94Xf+Tf9vSMhkfdZfbGGSerHS1FcRU08Qobm4SX9n4iDGsBONQwTEDOMd0DvcMk+3//NYOMCFokNrQAlgrZCKyTsTl7dV1/tNlDL+ZAtsoJtXG6CTnL3HrQl9OYUhpzchZaRCfBq+kolg==; 5:NiwW0R2eHfdsdVlvJjHBJl+wIB7XBwhju9aW6NWQxL+2nPtEjKPt3W4VJHQhPLrMgYOmnvcprURX5qaZPcnbsnWFmfU8jCpeEnWqoj345dJtHwsz33WqpOfaj4J7bDXLkt8pIKy01leDZzkhagkVCw==; 24:uvk3OfQ6aGBFQ6ARMfr2kPD5cZ08Kpt6WH5OaQdZCFFmLfrO/8wsQxh0wf6rnHsxKGDKEZ9gmTSYjL5jSDP8I1R2zFeUxJYAIt9UbtGN1+U=; 7:XuAjxguqaqQEowngFV+8iu1gF8hwHZhKwzCzbS2nrs8VFBpyCFo0QHzQerirgtvLDEjVdztcz8PiV0hykUSLGeki05pYLjmKvwqez6CL0kBKX36XaIAB0K/22x/wQ4d2rW7Ra86DiN12ELuzpRHKLpCWqNBEgn2AdbEddYmqN9kaZa2rzXFlq10dBVlc2l1/JWcicRdCP8xtciMw3y7ki4xd6B72Bi8SAV3hROtPPAo=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 36e5163d-56db-42b2-46f2-08d4e8f2a20d
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(300000500095)(300135000095)(300000501095)(300135300095)(22001)(300000502095)(300135100095)(2017030254152)(300000503095)(300135400095)(2017052603160)(49563074)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(300000504095)(300135200095)(300000505095)(300135600095)(300000506095)(300135500095); SRVR:BLUPR06MB179;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BLUPR06MB179:
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(158342451672863);
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR06MB1795C8AF185541C1CBD4932A7840@BLUPR06MB179.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(102415395)(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(93006095)(93001095)(100000703101)(100105400095)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123558100)(20161123560025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123555025)(20161123564025)(20161123562025)(6072148)(201708071742011)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:BLUPR06MB179; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:BLUPR06MB179;
x-forefront-prvs: 04073E895A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(24454002)(199003)(189002)(377424004)(53546010)(53936002)(25786009)(83716003)(102836003)(6436002)(6116002)(8936002)(558084003)(105586002)(4001150100001)(36756003)(106356001)(3280700002)(110136004)(6246003)(229853002)(57306001)(5660300001)(2900100001)(3660700001)(6512007)(99286003)(82746002)(305945005)(478600001)(7736002)(86362001)(68736007)(76176999)(189998001)(99936001)(39060400002)(97736004)(50986999)(2950100002)(4326008)(6506006)(14454004)(6916009)(81166006)(8676002)(81156014)(2906002)(50226002)(6486002)(33656002)(77096006)(101416001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR06MB179; H:BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: netapp.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_94D95FFD-6C17-4525-A6EA-0F17472EB2A3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Aug 2017 00:13:36.3497 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4b0911a0-929b-4715-944b-c03745165b3a
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR06MB179
X-OriginatorOrg: netapp.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/RG-V_hmVZ9nuU5zTSpoLOzTrGC8>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:18:43 -0000

On 2017-8-21, at 17:06, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
> Clearly the authors didn't understand why RSA was chosen by Google.

I asked whether they had thoughts on whether their results might be influenced by QUIC-Crypto and if IETF-QUIC might perform differently...

Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email