Consensus Calls on Recent Transport/TLS Issues (again)
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 16 August 2019 04:18 UTC
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC293120020 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 21:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=eU7QrWFK; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=nRlA8Ic9
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WLN2xdDS6s1W for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 21:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37C15120013 for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 21:18:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769B320222; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 00:18:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 16 Aug 2019 00:18:35 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=from :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject :message-id:date:cc:to; s=fm3; bh=+N33hJ1dPVALTTtvOsV1nWKl4EVwmS Zb366LshR7vCM=; b=eU7QrWFKN03NsAOH7NXMwblS5TEtxgrMpbwVkMH/v/xTkB iCKW0ie1WMpnPJmsJQzoUPJOjBiUooeDZHTBJj2wzL4hj4a9SJYH4TLJfQ6MF5H+ aF07P+U3KSkmdJWICsrCW/c2dF+2au8HMNysYflu9c+/YJyJgIPM1EfaNojh3OJY jxu7IhNOunoKeTk6kPzCBxEsvqYemuB2SM7N4btnYfJUtdoOHG+pvA/2PQojzGJD qcwu5VrzFOHyxY3TLJ/otPAy5zjq/eysWItKoDDLTVz55KFbrU1YAI6FCeqy07uq oa0aE2pRK07R8J/rU8ImW0QU0OzIASw3xHGA6DIQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=+N33hJ 1dPVALTTtvOsV1nWKl4EVwmSZb366LshR7vCM=; b=nRlA8Ic9cYXPAqkBET7vF/ axSF1hgtRvhrJfj1qPH/1u35gKbPZaFdjFklXv0sbh+yxZX2fky/R9cy4jssOUk3 gKVXozwwncBx0QdN6I7b1pZU1swhjFQY6Dv03J32Mgntkd0Y2EZg4mWzuty5u8gF VB2JJl5xyqiyNeEzuiIWeGRHEEd+DGFjWezUW0KXfVqNgkfOMeSohCTZsaUTC7hc rsaOX3KsFxT93yqtaRmJ+6xbFf913sLRV0jjNoLGBxRqC7kXigq1KbFleN65kHyF Zr4P18P3hTz1HdC7fhU05byzO19YykVqSrNI2mewWFUQJ9OEyHbCSVb/AZAnzs7w ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:mi5WXQzlCHQcyggiFLKL6Gy1lq-37UXq675M04n-g2tkJjMgwO6B3Q>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrudefvddgkedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephfgtgfgguffkfffvofesthhqmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhkucfp ohhtthhinhhghhgrmhcuoehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucffohhmrghinhepgh hithhhuhgsrdgtohhmpdhmnhhothdrnhgvthenucfkphepudeggedrudefiedrudejhedr vdeknecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecuve hluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:mi5WXRomwFCSFiv5fecnuK705zvDNB3SyZUlVPH4WL9Y-5tcyzQwvw> <xmx:mi5WXZoMBokJpbryiAo3XblGN1xrWzyv0pSXvdOVmCfZxes01r9HTA> <xmx:mi5WXZAinoSrVCGlEvJwjVY67jgRdKR2IUO5z4601NTAG-25F62FYA> <xmx:my5WXUCjGjcRy7LV8yROsyc2ObNSTQjDd_GN75Chjd7TdYq4HEJVVA>
Received: from macbook-pro.mnot.net (unknown [144.136.175.28]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F2A0D8005A; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 00:18:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Subject: Consensus Calls on Recent Transport/TLS Issues (again)
Message-Id: <8EDCB64E-68BC-4D3C-83CD-7455B3155E88@mnot.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:18:28 +1000
Cc: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
To: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/SB8QT2GFU_NkAtPqvwYvdgWJhAU>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 04:18:39 -0000
The following issues have proposals for resolution, and discussion so far seems to support consensus to accept them. If you object, please do so on the issue or in response to this message (changing the Subject appropriately!). Absent any pushback, we'll direct the editors to incorporate them next week. See <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/projects/5> for the current state of issues in the Late Stage process, itself defined at <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md>. * #2869: Stateless Reset packet sizes should not depend on the maximum connection ID length The proposal is: <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2927> * #2834: Long Header Packets and Routing Connection IDs The proposal is to close with no action. * #2770: If you want a Stateless Reset you need to send a larger packet than before The proposal is: <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2927> * #2656: Discarding connection state at server on unvalidated client The proposal is to make this an editorial issue. * #2541: Clients cannot abandon Initial packets while server can still send initial close The proposal is: <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2688> * #2534: ECN text disables ECN too aggressively The proposal is: <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2752> * #2205: Largest acked in ACK frame MUST NOT decrease The proposal is: <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2752> * #2151: Where can you send CONNECTION_CLOSE The proposal is: <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2688> * #2084: Discuss requirement that connection IDs not be correlatable The proposal is: <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2929> -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
- Consensus Calls on Recent Transport/TLS Issues (a… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Consensus Calls on Recent Transport/TLS Issue… Mark Nottingham