Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 12 November 2023 07:38 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83EB0C16F3EF for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 23:38:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.705
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.705 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="Gtchuu6h"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="L5It1VNr"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YsiC2GBuB_lA for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 23:38:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E6BFC16F3ED for <quic@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 23:38:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205445C00E4 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Nov 2023 02:38:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 12 Nov 2023 02:38:42 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to :mime-version:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t= 1699774722; x=1699861122; bh=JNjf7boQsxxhnElLPwzPDRS3k74jY2WKc9o wf/wXvVQ=; b=Gtchuu6hyAnSN9Ih0KsOnaN6n2mnhi2F9Dwb3AoKxxiJNyLb2Ua ktoTGG5nSVyYMOl7LGBliz9X2Xav+tQ5Nbt5mXg/cZneaNr99mUL86XKD11psrmu Ug8DT7li3khpeknNKiEkS6mHCf3niinDaiz3wJ8VMEaAyF2jJSgIaj7oCcSEomTo 5QSHt0a0nBfI4X35AEeASN063CfZ9Gy+a9g+Ir0Ft1Zuea8KmXkeIrreWwhLIyee 856OIIlWYsjw1zgWTT9DuSkfzbanrIQ2KjaeaSP1Qlkkivmt6gn8AIfF339tnHs8 mpeg410PYZMtX6ky9XlOIFKMsqwgjd5nFbw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1699774722; x= 1699861122; bh=JNjf7boQsxxhnElLPwzPDRS3k74jY2WKc9owf/wXvVQ=; b=L 5It1VNrnFnQ9Wf0QEqMkhpedTv1olA6gKUYYu7s+nFDGA278OeUgmQp/lHFVaKXy iO0ZSQnZT9S19QSt0Gz21XA5RRwX7p2t2BoZMZn5e+MFB+vAEVD4/1bqTJSP8t7m HZU3lJSwZSS4yJm785QRBDZHnbedBynEyfcbuPConjxL34ppebwiJOP2xsRTTrng q2xQ+mrdxqIqGpRA7BIi5KFYB8VU0s0IvbEWjBBo0+9f7Z3sBgs6gBUZcdHAmqz/ otDBrgln06h8hbD+5BoN/js8Bh6greR9gkEIPH8BZO44rE0qxR9bTUqkiLokMfVh 4wol/NViASnaeBpn/eGaA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:AYFQZS_z8_MYrOepIVWENZldltnmg4PC7lY6L84oEU8krkY0F2D73Q> <xme:AYFQZSvhpETpELEB3ZspOcTfnnrxGCaMhmKwfU493BqOuR-c7IYHD2tq0JJnql8kR l5a4SknhEx_6Rk2EA>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:AYFQZYDZhDEe4DouAT1P5ZowU6f4nA3tFMx3BoOf67XlRbXr2QiBoj8RYDMK4A1g0-EaAuFWu_wjLlcMXPSYuYwt7IBzTYBkrWZx_QoNnMuWg4Vwaq_C0HvD_jhFYBrFmuTmiw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedruddvjedggeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucfpohcuuggrthgvuchfihgvlhguucdlgeelmdenuc fjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeftvghpohhsihhtohhrhicu tegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceuohhtuceoughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihse hmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeefvdduteejvdefkeehieevuefg fefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtg homhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegu ohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:AYFQZacH3Td-kfc0x4qA5BdZE7j8oaCj4X9Qy8C4zJSw_l9phNXQSg> <xmx:AYFQZXMQNHpkBHjddEXEPLkbdxlH8csscwEHICRhkP22oq5GW6p_QQ> <xmx:AYFQZUnv3DMVBlGW7ESiKaaO6lcbRXhPw9egdsDDnXsZlxGEdGEi_A> <xmx:AoFQZWbuFfE63E9_KQFGrVZSatkfagCfH0eFv-ls9CUclatyO9pziw>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Nov 2023 02:38:41 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============2140857430381110105=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Message-Id: <20231112073845.1E6BFC16F3ED@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 23:38:44 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/T3goF2LyFhKv5CRfpQrm7NB60jc>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2023 07:38:50 -0000
Events without label "editorial"
Issues
------
* quicwg/qlog (+0/-2/💬2)
2 issues received 2 new comments:
- #275 Would an is_ack_eliciting flag be helpful for packet_sent events? (1 by LPardue)
https://github.com/quicwg/qlog/issues/275
- #142 Provide clear privacy and security guidelines (1 by LPardue)
https://github.com/quicwg/qlog/issues/142 [design] [privacy] [discuss] [ask-3rd-party]
2 issues closed:
- Would an is_ack_eliciting flag be helpful for packet_sent events? https://github.com/quicwg/qlog/issues/275
- Provide clear privacy and security guidelines https://github.com/quicwg/qlog/issues/142 [design] [privacy] [discuss] [ask-3rd-party]
* quicwg/multipath (+1/-0/💬25)
1 issues created:
- Do we actually have an established consensus on path definition? (by yfmascgy)
https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/291
3 issues received 25 new comments:
- #283 Sending PATH_STANDBY before the connection ID is used is pointless (1 by Yanmei-Liu)
https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/283 [question] [no-action-needed]
- #271 Discussion: Remove ACK_MP frame from draft-ietf-quic-multipath ？ (2 by iyangsj)
https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/271 [duplicate] [no-action-needed]
- #214 separate Path IDs from Connection IDs (22 by BillGageIETF, Yanmei-Liu, huitema, kazuho, michael-eriksson, yfmascgy)
https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/214 [duplicate] [design] [needs-discussion]
Pull requests
-------------
* quicwg/qlog (+2/-0/💬2)
2 pull requests submitted:
- Add raw_ack_delay field to AckFrame (by rmarx)
https://github.com/quicwg/qlog/pull/337
- Add path_id and Connection Migration events (by rmarx)
https://github.com/quicwg/qlog/pull/336
1 pull requests received 2 new comments:
- #337 Add raw_ack_delay field to AckFrame (2 by marten-seemann, rmarx)
https://github.com/quicwg/qlog/pull/337
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/datagram
* https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers
* https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation
* https://github.com/quicwg/quic-bit-grease
* https://github.com/quicwg/qlog
* https://github.com/quicwg/quic-v2
* https://github.com/quicwg/multipath
- Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot