IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Roman Danyliw's Yes on draft-ietf-quic-transport-33: (with COMMENT)

Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Wed, 06 January 2021 04:30 UTC

Return-Path: <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4367E3A0E04; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 20:30:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3lwo1AQz3A3r; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 20:30:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com (mail-ej1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 231DD3A0DFF; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 20:30:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id w1so3331284ejf.11; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 20:30:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BgOx2crZq0v00yET2HF1A0deP1X7cfBUD/kx3f53bW8=; b=rxwb4FKdWox0V8V3Lww6kmfWL9daP9MZx+wsyxtKRdGB75L9PkhpicNne1szq5EBTG xid0wIE8+Rroq77YoEel3GJGR7+Azv3Luwgf28+zMfWGV3nrH7srJMzH4t07UWeai8vZ rdzkGdETZ6N5z3h+qNezGGbgJeSEcEHRzvVu+0HGm+iII5t8eZtmyuz2TXon4J+of8Uv 4RJc1KPTqdM00B1qNh/UpxHZbBdwmyIoDLMAY2Z/c7ambjDhg+gguCKbTjMMXgjt8jvC x8GRZFKMO571jcfiYjgafrKMQKscjPQi2hGegGD6feCiwmjtPI1tzOz6gzlTU3oWQ3PB PSGQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BgOx2crZq0v00yET2HF1A0deP1X7cfBUD/kx3f53bW8=; b=CfCGq/dqBwG41Hf4KKWpouKJ3Osv1Y/laRRRsX6zDRu0JSpZVZc1uZCqIuQ/NVdIAE nWZTegOxnusYyznT8nNSyt7n6Qk0U1ieH26UVFH/QwUE5SgilNalHtfhAXN1i0i/mRmG NQybDElbHys36dgDwIlOrK5nXrKkPgvhVKwqSOPg7FodWL1D6TQHRaFu8ZnZIVPZH/Uf n8lPvhxAjfFay2Q+2mGK2fBFhcndRt7fcRpiNnHKHdblY2q97focMAivzx8/c0gyqO29 VpwKmFJU0lH16pK58ljOixt2WnBpYMiagATGMUnr4h4v9eQYryc7Q4UhyeVLu8f4LTwZ lGyw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533clfHW3V6YunkYk6JdykOeyvEK9gC/57/Z0wg4mo15bNEjR1dW 5VukEhWT4hqvF0VsQvmItvO2RUqM8+RHosVTEzA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyo852lIJWJVC3jscZKW6XbcvBiG/6CTJ4SP6etNNpAG2m3lEOoZFg2bxEtY7ssMB33DwAQbcxkQukd1CvDbyQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:358c:: with SMTP id o12mr1682730ejb.301.1609907420556; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 20:30:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160988707394.22369.1941637915786774837@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <160988707394.22369.1941637915786774837@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 04:30:09 +0000
Message-ID: <CALGR9oZ0bue3GyuqH+FTHTFYLsDDOeVPnpRU_cX5XNqpyiViNw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Roman Danyliw's Yes on draft-ietf-quic-transport-33: (with COMMENT)
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-quic-transport@ietf.org, WG Chairs <quic-chairs@ietf.org>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ec702705b833c75d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/TeE2xJAIg4if01r1Mc2ZJj3I8wQ>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2021 04:30:24 -0000

Hi Roman,

Thanks for the review. I've captured your comments as issues on the QUIC WG
GItHub repository. Links to each are provided as in-line responses.

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 10:51 PM Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-quic-transport-33: Yes
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-transport/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thank you to the WG and implementation community for this document.
>
> ** Section 3.  Per “The state machines shown in this section are largely
> informative ”, why the qualifier of “largely”?
>

https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4564


> ** Section 8.1.  Per “Servers SHOULD ensure that tokens sent in Retry
> packets
> are only accepted for a short time”, is there any guidance on what a short
> time
> is here?
>

https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4565


> ** Section 21.5.  Per “QUIC servers SHOULD NOT be deployed in networks that
> also have inadequately secured UDP endpoints”, I was wondering if this
> caution
> is a realistic.
>

https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4566

Cheers,
Lucas
On behalf of QUIC WG Chairs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email