Re: QUIC IANA registries requiring multiple approvals (was: Expert Review for draft-ietf-quic-v2)

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Tue, 11 October 2022 22:37 UTC

Feedback-ID: ic129442d:Fastmail
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-1047-g9e4af4ada4-fm-20221005.001-g9e4af4ad
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <8f25ae8f-f809-4965-9ccd-02b4a592360e@betaapp.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPDSy+7W=7LAoc+61e5hcR1UFY2YSsbNyh7KM9-U5RE=iPfh0w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-1240901@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-29705-1665424934-1640.1240901-9-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-26343-1665425334-324.1240901-9-0@icann.org> <CAKcm_gOyGgiOREGQi44VyDEYbKkr5in1UeA+G4oJuwoxxmQ9bw@mail.gmail.com> <e013d487-41e4-4948-86e3-8e46841e28e3@betaapp.fastmail.com> <CAM4esxQnDRh7sTqOztZGFx72DKGSifkbWN4-r5h8JB73Sf-hdQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPDSy+7W=7LAoc+61e5hcR1UFY2YSsbNyh7KM9-U5RE=iPfh0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 09:37:15 +1100
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>, QUIC <quic@ietf.org>
Cc: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>, Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: QUIC IANA registries requiring multiple approvals (was: Expert Review for draft-ietf-quic-v2)
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/VshSLwiioyI0nADi4EONjqTe2GY>
Precedence: list

We don't require that all three validate the registration.  Ian only asked that his approval be double-checked, which I think is appropriate in this case, especially when we found the minor error.

Overall, IANA lets experts decide whether one or multiple experts need to approve registrations.  We've informally adopted a policy of double-checking for this registry, but I would propose that only apply to permanent registrations.

On Wed, Oct 12, 2022, at 07:44, David Schinazi wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Why do we require reviews from all three QUIC IANA designated experts 
> instead of round robin or first response? This practice is unusual 
> compared to other registries and sounds like it will introduce 
> significant delays.
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 8:46 AM Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yes, permanent
>> 
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 5:10 PM Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:
>>> I can approve the registration, but the draft should be requesting a *permanent* registration.  It is currently provisional.
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2022, at 06:16, Ian Swett wrote:
>>> > This looks good to me.  Please wait for Jana or Martin to respond as 
>>> > well before finalizing.
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 2:08 PM David Dong via RT 
>>> > <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> wrote:
>>> >> Dear Jana, Ian, Martin (cc: quic wg),
>>> >> 
>>> >> As the designated experts for the QUIC Versions registry, can you review the proposed registration in draft-ietf-quic-v2 for us? Please see
>>> >> 
>>> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-v2/
>>> >> 
>>> >> The due date is 24 Oct 2022.
>>> >> 
>>> >> If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication, we'll make the registration at
>>> >> 
>>> >> https://www.iana.org/assignments/quic/
>>> >> 
>>> >> We'll wait for all three reviewers to respond unless you tell us otherwise.
>>> >> 
>>> >> With thanks,
>>> >> 
>>> >> David Dong
>>> >> IANA Services Specialist
>>>

[IANA #1240901] Expert Review for draft-ietf-quic… David Dong via RT
Re: [IANA #1240901] Expert Review for draft-ietf-… Ian Swett
Re: [IANA #1240901] Expert Review for draft-ietf-… Martin Thomson
Re: [IANA #1240901] Expert Review for draft-ietf-… Martin Duke
QUIC IANA registries requiring multiple approvals… David Schinazi
Re: QUIC IANA registries requiring multiple appro… Martin Thomson
Re: QUIC IANA registries requiring multiple appro… Magnus Westerlund
Re: QUIC IANA registries requiring multiple appro… Ian Swett
Re: QUIC IANA registries requiring multiple appro… David Schinazi