IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Consensus call for Request Forgery Attacks (#3995)

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 08 September 2020 22:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 058793A00C9 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:43:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UzBcM9BnPldA for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com (mail-lj1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CE1E3A046A for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 15:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id s205so976008lja.7 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 15:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5S5Tkqw5lNAPBGQ1+E5P1GQMgY3LYcQJGNbamkAMFUE=; b=UhWkqu8r+rzSiJu1fQG2bG+QLfhjyTb80T+UUBtwea6+y5sDKcyM4AUaAQRlG93L3T mc5Dz6d/5quIirGWpHWORCQO8Ut6JvXuYyuoYlpQFvgxIBgNIvlEoObRj4Pk0eqAjdc5 sf8KUPrBQ5kX4w5AGkk8z/WiNhPJTaJGyG6UGIqtOuLbnqpJLI4P0qXWtCpzRWCKIGH4 kVLLFRSD1mD1+ollXgiL4hHctyUvbvlzZsffXUjeezRVton78X03xNxv3yFef93qUk+C JwT5QsQbNFeknXLiIR3pwCyourMAnpH3vI64Zu2gy3ixT+uliOhB3fSwunWNkGzUioNf BfkQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5S5Tkqw5lNAPBGQ1+E5P1GQMgY3LYcQJGNbamkAMFUE=; b=Mp0CZMQqBLH+udmTE9MJTlYA1mGd3sdVPcrINovSF1mK7zC4Us9Q/px2iiyHrOMzC3 kkHRB9HOUu5h73QxYNEKlFPLTML0HuJwaMIhpjQU6RddOKLai8UjZVdJeV4ZR2V9UTmz zWnv8I5oOxlVqRXzb9ByZhO5ASp8Nr1KqSTmJp7Og3v7UtS+fEz8KzYilFYAvHRTGoTi BngvnzN/I6xl791i0lP2E9QHpGtYtnY95BUB7ZhzWbcFsP8xe7/gNpD9YsYzq8cLOtwN zp/pAs4r7MjG8Uztxac2mFI1m/cNJA5Fj3LUEQEwr80BpFiDfv44J+amlzOrogH1yd0h gL1Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5302b20hB1dSls+1saBSmP9+vY9tjPrIVTcaJBooHunkdF9iJTE+ jpwMQqyhpXi+Nfmouzv4fUjBXFIYRzSJechK61jAsg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx3xEfjag9LjTy1/oCSabnJ80+QLpXIBAx6GPelBqK1SM+u+92KgyTqlTxE2vaLk8xrdsnN4RHun+0z0wshtM8=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8114:: with SMTP id d20mr323231ljg.409.1599605009191; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 15:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALGR9oZPp+e+8xxBFECoR+jCDpDr0qAEcCTxyow7qvAwfENyiQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPue4JQfdb_8wD8xhNnPX-2-6mcB=tbYV1eQhBAH78kfg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPDSy+4txqn5T-yrCpCWMN8vEjT8-DL34WSkwSETGUCi+cB_gA@mail.gmail.com> <CALGR9oZUaAqEqN3+Ej_O2Aax2jp1q-DEZ=naSreUDKBNF7n09A@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOArWEO-cEv5yyqJf7z0CFGCFU3PG4R_8CnYg_S5dDisw@mail.gmail.com> <CALGR9obvhFVmZhyckgXPcyeYTzWeKDr_h38t5xTXcUPQVmzjcA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBMj7tbWKTEPnvCwUW_NdbL4nGxXDoWYXni4vvP_fAnMNg@mail.gmail.com> <CALGR9oZP74q+8QiCBTw=Dvyp_YZZY_8C-6pj_0N2E+U3YoeY=w@mail.gmail.com> <508EDB55-3E2D-44D2-9ADC-AF7814495A60@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <508EDB55-3E2D-44D2-9ADC-AF7814495A60@eggert.org>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 15:42:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBOjaPnSgNTOPRa-2T30mUFyPbF2jONQqtoM4cSL=GGt6g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Consensus call for Request Forgery Attacks (#3995)
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Cc: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>, David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005aa5d305aed5100a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/Vyh-O3N9rhZDVSTvyd4t24BIyuc>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 22:43:34 -0000

OK. I'll file a new issue soon (probably tomorrow)

-Ekr


On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 4:56 AM Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 2020-9-5, at 18:19, Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Since you're happy with the current text in PR 3996, I genuinely think
> it would be clearer for the WG to capture your suggested options in a new
> issue with a narrower focus of discussion. We can make that a prerequisite
> action to closing issue 3995.
>
> based on the follow-on discussion on this thread, we've decided to go
> forward with this, i.e., merge 3996, close 3995 as a consequence, and
> require any additional desired changes to go through a new issue for
> clarity.
>
> Thanks,
> Lars
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email