QUIC experiments with forward error correction
Simone Ferlin-Oliveira <ferlin@simula.no> Tue, 18 April 2017 19:04 UTC
Return-Path: <ferlin@simula.no>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 486C113146F for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 12:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=simula-no.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FDnUb4lFL9mc for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 12:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x232.google.com (mail-lf0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 003A01293D9 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 12:04:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id c80so1084737lfh.3 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 12:04:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=simula-no.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=I00lSoqjp9SyVfC5UhdRUYIt75xm8NgDdAnPcbE1fS8=; b=kNdSgVxEQgbS3F8L4J4G5p3imMj23Bk/ju1R2khNYwgnehWarLsW4fVsNjKDSUi9nq zvWYrBHH1UqJa/8K1kYU7jSPjBVn9J4KgLDH6hCwTr85TrmE/RIKDKhl5ofrltODfWLs oLjkMuKvlyTGnu4Gdi94tEeLzRaIGsecVLPesCuX/9HcFz0wqoiPZRHVBx+odXofALXL q/57CB2uR0InyvRNusl7ZhXWdqzNnZAzqBjXWKrwZoRNeizqiwwAaTzShUYjO0GUVaxW vb92sAA8frZdd+4QFPDHb5+QWtTcRUd3D/wYuIIcdRubrGBuoipb9SbaquDwy+Cuxz5E C+4g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=I00lSoqjp9SyVfC5UhdRUYIt75xm8NgDdAnPcbE1fS8=; b=DV44dZwg39K1x/+RqdHkPzOoz3smvtEkhOWFCvQYqgQrfgSXOTjbFa5A5UGX/aqtd2 Z4uPIPQcQekO7OZxyM13aK7RasC6qD5GhBy78KjB19qrfZ4SjELk02KXPdWUXgRNk4BZ iD43eCJPI/t42ldoI+dTAm0YBvyUbwIe5PObZrxOmG5AMo06hBSBMRO34QZ7Ch92GUrr 9ZfYZ9oryZBWgFpoUvrCqVSLBlD9Y3tvebxtl09wD5l2dEjCJN/ZxbujF/6LwJPlw6Oz S2j7CWa5RBgX3qmfoy3o1mXYGlrCjhbqA/SrJxnWp17SfbT5yNcG2TeerDQYzYhq5/fo bS1Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/78Zry614KbjHK5ZjuMgB20gq55Hm256YgtWN2cZA3YaQuiMZgw n/8rJNx2B++/Q1UF0Y2CPcm/9kTTY79FrcxWjw==
X-Received: by 10.25.16.93 with SMTP id f90mr6084963lfi.91.1492542259061; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 12:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.163.74 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 12:04:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: Simone Ferlin-Oliveira <ferlin@simula.no>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 21:04:18 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPJm55PnBnixow7aHKpitt1ojPnKDd22COF16tY5zc-LHtTnSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: QUIC experiments with forward error correction
To: quic@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/YPiAqNYGnADqWYESjlcMutadc1A>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 19:04:23 -0000
Dear all, I have been following QUIC's implementation for some time, and in an old thread of earlier experiments (~IETF'88) [1,2], J. Roskind mentioned some experiments with XOR-FEC that resulted in bad performance with YouTube traffic. I went through the current repo, and couldn't find much about it - it looks there is some dead code with some FEC definitions, or are there any plans to revive the topic [3,4]? If there are no plans to revive it, does anybody remember anything about it from the tsvarea? I would be interested in the implementation of the XOR-FEC, how it was experimented inside QUIC. [1]: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!topic/proto-quic/Z5qKkk2XZe0 [2]: https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/slides/slides-88-tsvarea-10.pdf [3]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hamilton-early-deployment-quic-00 [4]: https://github.com/google/proto-quic/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=FEC&type= Cheers, Simone
- QUIC experiments with forward error correction Simone Ferlin-Oliveira