IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-kuhn-quic-0rtt-bdp-07.txt

Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Tue, 27 October 2020 01:20 UTC

Return-Path: <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E27F3A116B for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:20:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m6aioJMtu_s5 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x635.google.com (mail-ej1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::635]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B0283A1166 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x635.google.com with SMTP id ce10so16992610ejc.5 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iiK0K0DaqgRd7P+HTH2KLiFAsy4SzcS4ZphzV/tGLz8=; b=f6Uew4eaCfTXbUbuq5QM9mrsD3JbciZevCJDj5CEojqt7Hyy9KQQER+2QHIjJ0Dqay XWS7VjXxoBAYi9D92WFzn7vuCVCy9wLm4irRQ3GRCYuur0kuxp4xFDQQWlrlSqBVeLT/ G24+N6PaXJzB99M2VEj1uuwCm2MNT5Bjib5Humb4c90KRHrSZnggV+/fVsPSPfIJYNo3 dcR+BhcUKbnwiq+Z4dnZVLFYSJoarWNagD4Tq5CZ49FHx1ynYP1gp0JH/XIFOBCAcytp ReHovAx7+cNH8UhCgSqzxTCKiH+PKlgn4GCEQnQVyZ9x3VAamQTn7d0qS0KrLYXH5p3p xJ6g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iiK0K0DaqgRd7P+HTH2KLiFAsy4SzcS4ZphzV/tGLz8=; b=IZnuI2tZKAc1iXJZzfCYFYdB5gFHJsw++kR1dWYiHbNPrZWQp8uHs9GqPetmopbFmW h84Jq4laCZDXdf7wHwNP3lPrgmY5jcuEHT0yeTqRLF0UNDlFJf5vKUq4ILvekKMZl6Mp JOXhf91eL9QMYKaXlXyChpiv3gldrnNHe4TQ9m9PZGr7lX9TRioyfaulHboqyPzfa2ZH 3FoGHlQ7LGSIndtvQ+/O/1PuHVSIqclCMHQ2r5Iqpq1RbdVIwE4AvcTqTXJLYTagGE1I WvrSoKTUMtj81T2dKiFpswDpiDqIACT6bp0co8NU+6wTA0gr1XhOe5tpOh1e4hEFka5W cwhw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532gSOlo30I13fCpYqKbpxMgPn2AkKL5YjKh7NUGIJzOscTEbQBB OSFZHd+zsp8e2SzoB5q1rtpBWhATOBqbnveKSKc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwEvBPqesqQcbct/qA4+wJkl1tQYKRZV6kIoSB5d5CNyFMIb8sGCbl0kSLnH6upx5/Krix2Z2UbOIansLCUZzY=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3b43:: with SMTP id h3mr38540ejf.542.1603761631999; Mon, 26 Oct 2020 18:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158978951893.22751.4814113172992555805@ietfa.amsl.com> <F3B0A07CFD358240926B78A680E166FF1EDAB042@TW-MBX-P03.cnesnet.ad.cnes.fr> <CANatvzw8+tUG2NjO2OoN1FgsE5mZdzTVZ05ACSTR2zseDdasBg@mail.gmail.com> <55494829-b0eb-43c3-2717-fcae429c8b04@huitema.net> <CANatvzzkD3+R6qWbpwoxyh4neq2+c_WwRU7eNKuDuYmu1a1Yhw@mail.gmail.com> <CADdTf+i20uC9LBdp0X+FVHtkbq-WEKGUCvZZ2QXoxKDiNvyMcg@mail.gmail.com> <CALGR9oaTS_7vwLroR6beKB5A2gq_q4-cj8qdnnrbY+Gh-_ixng@mail.gmail.com> <CADdTf+gFS+5C_FuKX0KddkO5_y7PVZ=V91CN-_V2WSHh4zAcYA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADdTf+gFS+5C_FuKX0KddkO5_y7PVZ=V91CN-_V2WSHh4zAcYA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 01:20:23 +0000
Message-ID: <CALGR9oa1a1=hDfD8J-WnUOtoK2HXzBq=bkQSZOpDT1qzcr7Yhg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-kuhn-quic-0rtt-bdp-07.txt
To: Matt Joras <matt.joras@gmail.com>
Cc: Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>, Kuhn Nicolas <nicolas.kuhn@cnes.fr>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000613b7705b29cda4b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/ZFd2Begm0OOjyWQUvuwVrgJkm44>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 01:20:40 -0000

On Tue, 27 Oct 2020, 01:12 Matt Joras, <matt.joras@gmail.com> wrote:

> Indeed, but as much as I love HTTP it's not the only protocol we have on
> top of QUIC. A consistency argument can also be made for having a
> connection-level metric tied to a connection-level semantic (i.e. a QUIC
> frame) rather than the transactional-level semantic (HTTP header).
>

I agree! A QUIC-level frame could be the most appropriate thing in this
case. I think this will be an interesting space for innovation. And let's
not forget all the other datagram-oriented protocols that have preceeded -
so perhaps there will be some re-innovation.

This makes me wonder how Web Transport might approach supporting QUIC
extensions. But that is a digression.

Cheers
Lucas




>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email