Re: IETF 119 call for items

[François Michel <[e-mail]>]

Hi all,

This answer is addressed to everyone in the list. If there is a little 
room in the agenda, maybe would it be an appropriate time to spark again 
some discussions about FEC in the QUIC loss recovery ? We already have a 
draft, implementations and results to show. That being said, a slot in 
the agenda would feel even more appropriate if there is a demonstrated 
public interest from the group in discussing the topic.

If you think it makes sense to discuss the topic, don't hesitate to let 
us know, either by replying in this e-mail, publicly or privately. I'm 
not seeking for any form of adoption, but we have a few years of 
research work to show and discuss in the group. :-)

Regards,

François


Le 26/01/24 à 20:14, Matt Joras a écrit :
> Hello all,
> 
> We are reaching out a little bit earlier this time to put out a call
> for items at our next meeting at IETF 119. As usual, our focus will be
> on adopted WG documents, but we anticipate some time being available
> for new topics. Please reach out if you have some, we will as usual
> apply priority to those that are likely to result in new adopted work.
> 
> Expect a draft agenda to follow as usual closer to the meeting date.
> 
> Best,
> Matt & Lucas
> QUIC WG Chairs
>