Re: Call for consensus: HTTP/2 Priorities
Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 16 August 2019 22:07 UTC
Return-Path: <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 197A712008B for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 15:07:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PyWErHJdaF7D for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 15:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22f.google.com (mail-lj1-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D86CE120018 for <quic@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 15:07:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id u15so6586438ljl.3 for <quic@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 15:07:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0KvDtQNTNpV4ZeWmB8N5RtiVFfi9c16pgTIDijf3V78=; b=dnxw8bV65KyV4e1ZMsKPCd30qGQFUsUlHWgJFbqOcc0RTU2Grljylcc7Ct7gOW4XsE JI9Ch30yuHVSZPB46dYeUYIGwBqBDrzTfCvyfUBdzqlDuXLAkPk6nL/GKMKijQP4Yaci D6MLGLIyX8yZPHdRSaGW9rkwHESHZCH7yAF1lAYKFqt6XWBWX8Bm9EA6Q0VFhMZ3dMRh I3Aphs0dVoRIwYf/zYMGHKoPWeV4DuFHECjhG/jbNdowPoZBCHg576CG/Rfs//JH5L6T djmoYtIG5tcwZwXkzGvcqS1PGeZBTNKpSSvDea5hZzR2Qm4lmfyozqotL/n9mttLtrd2 flBg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0KvDtQNTNpV4ZeWmB8N5RtiVFfi9c16pgTIDijf3V78=; b=ttUU3CIxPdrrPbfkwMZqIPpoAg9FYNDuJPAsRHFnOD5O7ENRZu4c5UxviQgyFjvEw/ vo2BnX5NDXijgT8075o/5qLzxYWnsWt6L91iJDyOqCMK9syEnIs8H+wRW9fe1OmGR9PB hb4k0jL2xTgFEk0EGZfLZfbAUnCmH1/9c4HvGIceyHLbDGzA+vsonNaITlfCVkzhxok+ WMZlfeAYF8XXnxVSa3QfgzZx27+gH6DwSnaWTQAlshj7RBbI48+mTuQcY0pswr4cK5DS rXW3SDuoBT34F04ZLatydh7aRxr194CTaOiCafL/JTIiAATX6XvNcuwcCm/d3DPkYuMz H3sg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV5nFrGN9LNVznp+kkmgEzRA+4JPnRu0BvuGMk1wWa8JDJCnslF KhePS5Egv8pODThiUWtLmiZ2EiEGymM924qSWys=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzabRV9L+Tfhh8ngk63H8WPjvg6GiqvQ4lN4j27hcB2d0LDPeV+L/IeYqZ9ZavSFrjZZxL7lOI7GbA5SdaqlZ8=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8744:: with SMTP id q4mr6590373ljj.77.1565993267928; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 15:07:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5E8935DC-6FB5-40F8-A843-1B3991D08CB9@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <5E8935DC-6FB5-40F8-A843-1B3991D08CB9@mnot.net>
From: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 15:07:37 -0700
Message-ID: <CACpbDcddQK3yO-hCrFys6eFYZXYvXzJ-SM68ix0xkGt_t52OJA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Call for consensus: HTTP/2 Priorities
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000074a27105904338e1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/_yr71xd58y3yDrcEbdBbHpO26cI>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 22:07:52 -0000
+1 to removing the current priorities from HTTP/3. On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 8:49 PM Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote: > In Montreal, we had a discussion about priorities, where the outcome was > that people in the room agreed to defer to the HTTP Working Group regarding > whether HTTP/3 should ship with something compatible with HTTP/2 priorities > in it: > > https://github.com/quicwg/wg-materials/blob/master/ietf105/minutes.md#h3-priorities > > Since then, the HTTP Working Group has come to consensus that it does not > believe we should do so: > https://www.w3.org/mid/00CD4B65-7015-45F6-9F18-624B0DB7A501@mnot.net > > This consensus call is to confirm this approach in this WG. In practical > terms, it means we will remove the current HTTP/2-aligned priorities > machinery from HTTP/3. It does NOT necessarily mean that HTTP/3 will ship > without any form of priorities; just not this one. Doing so will resolve a > number of outstanding issues, and make way for a replacement scheme, > currently under discussion in a design team in the HTTP Working Group. > > Please respond by the middle of next week; we'd like to move forward with > this resolution. > > Kind regards, > > -- > Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ > >
- Call for consensus: HTTP/2 Priorities Mark Nottingham
- Re: Call for consensus: HTTP/2 Priorities Jana Iyengar
- Re: Call for consensus: HTTP/2 Priorities Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
- Re: Call for consensus: HTTP/2 Priorities Robin MARX
- Re: Call for consensus: HTTP/2 Priorities Ryan Hamilton
- Re: Call for consensus: HTTP/2 Priorities Tommy Pauly
- Re: Call for consensus: HTTP/2 Priorities Mark Nottingham
- Re: Call for consensus: HTTP/2 Priorities Mark Nottingham