Consensus Calls on Recent Transport/TLS Issues, week of 25 September
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Wed, 25 September 2019 07:31 UTC
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF681200B8 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=Zr8oSfLY; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=JuFrYhlp
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7q71pL2Knk70 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0814C120041 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3006D22444; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 03:31:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 03:31:11 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=from :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject :message-id:date:cc:to; s=fm3; bh=wK1ry581iPqpXxL8VUzv4OFQ2+EkOh wMWOReaoXcxcI=; b=Zr8oSfLYa81fvw+mimfTE1pTvusPYmUv4jIDiMULQOO524 7r9+AzPepDtK6RnKEDm7lCCIqgoSH/vz3IKy3o+mCZTgQ4xAH0yUVGNW8zxr8rtP hhT8cLa2B+cDkh/vBCo8aTeEgb2yqlmvIb8Y9FqpeWX+eWzmPvE0ZPKB8Y5HlizP bDI8rdB4DZ8d6k8LgSC8/lfv0jOsBFW5LCRWf4kFCVcrWxVfUsTNE6ogDYvimsQE aE0293j+36/0yDAM8l6RE8s9/yASIWhM6V/f19p8OU7bYPxRMsZ/eUoxDgicqNIo Bs3KmDcmVygPIQkq+tKyYL21PBjt7P7f12Gc4GHA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=wK1ry5 81iPqpXxL8VUzv4OFQ2+EkOhwMWOReaoXcxcI=; b=JuFrYhlpDFXh9H6q1LRfiU H0l13Ww5xnDchDk2H3KiHp21SQh30QW6IQS0Znq50ajuDct0rahsA9jBOjS8yYIm Tb3j/hp1GgkjrZ0oMx0iyhAXd07rUnE3zfnc1+vVvBN6elpZVkAcA76okAU8T7rp WWQewAStzQ0kDTVfwhgwzi+kb4a/SKkeEi6GucxAK6S8Vqa3b1ADcJYPO5stux7d 0oiDCJA1vRy39tiXjFP8nLUEKXtFSU8/F1wW6aQqUBRy88ZlvrS0rNKuBXelOxt/ T7FvtShWBgeXrXs6IlPNsPoasNtEh5OiQoZMmDDS5aAKYJC6eyWkGx0eoi1kjtqQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:vReLXchLb143tvCLsiZ8STFeM5mP1wdrvPc7m-HwF-wU5Cr1JPL7NA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrfedugdduvddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephfgtgfgguffkfffvofesthhqmhdthhdtvdenucfhrhhomhepofgrrhhkucfp ohhtthhinhhghhgrmhcuoehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucffohhmrghinhepgh hithhhuhgsrdgtohhmpdhmnhhothdrnhgvthenucfkphepuddrudegfedrheekrdegvden ucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvthenucevlhhush htvghrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:vReLXRPi024F-Fl0Jc8r0-lmK4WNSpouaHqFLmpoA-o1ok1Pw3slNQ> <xmx:vReLXW8Kd-sQ4HGsfW5RHiA0FM5RlY36PIetzqKF3hy_gyuOz1pZmA> <xmx:vReLXb4tZ_GQbQ4BY9cgxGA61lDcRVZWDrKIigRUiJgBGToJi42TBw> <xmx:vxeLXYwlrJ7aKD7OgtfVxOyCK8MNlV2d1Eq5u0LeM5yMKnf9H583Qg>
Received: from [IPv6:2001:8004:1200:70bc:7094:3ec1:bad:4f47] (unknown [1.143.58.42]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2CCBAD6005F; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 03:31:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Subject: Consensus Calls on Recent Transport/TLS Issues, week of 25 September
Message-Id: <BF6C55D6-35A8-4433-9637-BC72259E2014@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:30:59 +1000
Cc: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
To: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/cB2zq4emPpvkSc4D8nNyhR-yuaY>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 07:31:14 -0000
The following issues have proposals for resolution, and discussion so far seems to support consensus to accept them. If you object, please do so on the issue or in response to this message (changing the Subject appropriately!). Absent any pushback, we'll direct the editors to incorporate them next week. See <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/projects/5> for the current state of issues in the Late Stage process, itself defined at <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md>. * #3053: Padding requirement seems to be incorrect. The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/commit/6cfcbe26385> * #3034: Allow PING in Initial/Handshake? The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3035> * #3030: Remove Requirement of an Acknowledgement per Round Trip The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3055> * #3010: Validating 0-RTT configuration in TLS API The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2947> * #2785: Disallow reuse of stateless reset tokens The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2968> * #2152: Why does stateless reset have to be checked after MAC failure The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2993> -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
- Consensus Calls on Recent Transport/TLS Issues, w… Mark Nottingham
- Re: Consensus Calls on Recent Transport/TLS Issue… Mark Nottingham