IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-32

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Tue, 17 November 2020 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C813A1523; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:54:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2kT0snj4WHdO; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:54:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AE713A14EF; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:53:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com with SMTP id o71so19459085ybc.2; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:53:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=pP+nazxhsFSZwre8Y1VgYZr/OKkhkJ9ru6WOHY7Y7Pc=; b=D8xmJh9hP+u2IYJ7qFu3uRMuvno1KGAVyynbiyL7sCX+hdWEoaaZTOeU+zhcQkH+bI zIF4irSKaKQYW1Kjwtyvcmkh92qwZXotYDauGf7M+oFD6vPd7OD2HNwTC+ZsOX3ZMWwA 8o9ktX0neOL5rLQyIbYZ4333s+T0us5HnkZm77BmV4W4A9hh6/bcwgkXQXasmM2wM8OC BrPxSXZA78ZNOyCZn/zzz68y4lgQdb88SVgJW9DGjeNvxPO/yACLDWf/d0/Sb0KBQKGJ 0iUMOtchhj3JFTNzpf/BBQIxCnV5dKx0q2n3lBegZjgjaAzFGNh3t0NgXNthkZK59gnb UZqQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pP+nazxhsFSZwre8Y1VgYZr/OKkhkJ9ru6WOHY7Y7Pc=; b=ahxq0QwJyaIYPEuIez94SPilRjgN+566MnqG/acEIpHwNhF1W3dWAOaRwVjbeyRUl0 2BP5vKzHnng3vWHCcMyrtb756D5GXy5MF4c181BbiVV0zYObInhxitOOIgT9fkxQUe6S ynfSQFgQI5R9WnLyZTCnMcuN+h3EJnrM12WCspQjjvw134kdYkJXfl9BHVKJX40YAbV4 HmJCckpRdj6r79dXR5znTs2zqYk7GrTl3rL/GDSNnzHeB9thV7gwVe3473pAB+Aw+hJH 3BzC0wCvI1PoVydn9J8277E4Zn36NYG7S1kzDaF6TINqJbe+5eThqE0TIK4yBi41pnue vQ6A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532QOesfUoM5nIM62DZ9O5FOVdFOhg1JAh5pVgDgNz1Tu4VDZucv y89L2HbBoSRJwJyZleGvoB2V7YI2NDl28qefn4g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxl+yYZdYEENyTnuR9Cy9OmBLuo5lZL6eEARn+4bJwqn9m9yXW95DawPf/P3+ZHjT8H19kc+YzNBYqGm3r/RAM=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:d416:: with SMTP id m22mr1025081ybf.318.1605635619432; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 09:53:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160563050450.18751.9577108468364180835@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAC8QAcft_n3i+DOfg6FT07eZh6KC1jh1gQyD2-mYG+uJ4NDWzg@mail.gmail.com> <CALGR9oZcDUqwk-Wo2aptqKo3h=+55u_6gZe+0fiy+2fsQmsjiQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC8QAcdt2ZtL--M_TKVT69qKgf=ONBqPZdRLVskVXcBGhW8YtA@mail.gmail.com> <bcd93b60-89dd-ddac-fdfc-ae2819aa7972@huitema.net>
In-Reply-To: <bcd93b60-89dd-ddac-fdfc-ae2819aa7972@huitema.net>
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:53:28 -0600
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcfURhgKjW=t8obDQfR5_gU8GzV145nd3GpeAGw2YX=esw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-32
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Cc: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>, Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>, Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-quic-transport.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bc306405b4512c0c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/d0h9mz5Fo9ZFiBhU8bywYJd50SU>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:54:18 -0000

On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 11:45 AM Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
wrote:

>
> On 11/17/2020 9:36 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
>
> ...
>
> I just want to say that in Software Engineering, specification teams and
> implementation teams are usually different, that is my background.
> As I said this is a deep issue. Certainly it is good the chairs pay
> attention to it.
>
> Remember the motto of the IETF, "rough consensus and running code?" That's
> pretty much how the QUIC WG has been operating, and I find that refreshing.
>


I respect that.

But I think it is taking it to the extreme.
I personally find quic drafts full of detail that I do not appreciate that
content because I am not an implementer.

So abstracting out these implementation details would make the reading much
more pleasant.
As I said such a style change requires changing the team :)

Behcet

Behcet

> -- Christian Huitema
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status