Re: draft-ietf-quic-http-05 and PUSH_PROMISE
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 17 August 2017 01:43 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24CB913226B for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:43:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 86lK1AYPHUjl for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x230.google.com (mail-io0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAE78132391 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x230.google.com with SMTP id g71so18775525ioe.5 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=vuoXEAE+bq89k+jBQqd6TFwDj8EG3vVIQg4DlQob0uc=; b=QgXilXjoWEKHtWZeBA0SzERkNzFlEpTdUbu/bt+AG0D/bzMnl6vyYgxFK3UJd2Y8fh KMGTbVS3BTTkiuuxERtBRfTdqhYJH/7ZUUm1R7seobLiIMlWP/xE5VbN34vPrxJ+dAPt 4A2moas3GhUE2c+v5IWfby5lIs3XdN7/b0lq+GWNrnLCsjDwqnjBfDJ2B7p2gYAz8GBr MUUSgG29Oz9pKWQPSArjMSRQCkYt91ImeDaU0US8VP/z0UXFobvN5WZwGertxnVSgrQa k2smTtj1XfC7eswRcI+GFs+0J1LEbcOnNMo5o+/nLnuTuTMTS0WQpQgs/cJLGXRusqpr PfDw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vuoXEAE+bq89k+jBQqd6TFwDj8EG3vVIQg4DlQob0uc=; b=M53ZYgkI8rIg/RM82J9pXWR5LfCPR2hSxgKSodvIj+XQWmZyJo6NteNvpJyWfMSLQx 6lpuxgr84awPWDqcc5Y4QKPAOCiK5RK1ZSe0qc1NJl3+J+4iEX/MQJPwrReKGsJ8/Dnr N2XYVUYM/jd97Ni1Sp/t2LxExt5aV8pcC+Qlz9t/GfF6COZEgaAI3UW1NzKP4JdMAY/Z dLlJCgu7M/TzDI8lOyJ3UXwwf9Sl3uxfYAa2Mb4o6HOA+RgBZKzxOT49W9Pz6BAkjkN4 jfKWr5uzaCxuHSD3vW57XxsWmDDl3EJqa1PF4ZGDpFPYpned/JO67cEkgTvCr9L5b8as WUhQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5hpBz2OGnRvp9Rd4PkacYFy0N1JmPA0plHEstNp1darduJR8MaA /3yCnh1UkoEpK8Ve2M0fKZ6KZ5b2VA==
X-Received: by 10.107.16.196 with SMTP id 65mr3681808ioq.297.1502934186018; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.164.42 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAD-iZUY24ZbvF9xsNvsHGY1MF_GEHrnKqfbYbMDXgA8iQPD0LQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD-iZUY24ZbvF9xsNvsHGY1MF_GEHrnKqfbYbMDXgA8iQPD0LQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 11:43:05 +1000
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXQWqr=akJOjAX2C=wzvk-CyCz+rxi=gtg1OtapHr2MVA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-quic-http-05 and PUSH_PROMISE
To: Charles 'Buck' Krasic <ckrasic@google.com>
Cc: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/d31paipY4FK8csdpgbOVhNG53vY>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 01:43:09 -0000
Open an issue? A PUSH_PROMISE is a request, and we could say that. On 17 August 2017 at 06:36, Charles 'Buck' Krasic <ckrasic@google.com> wrote: > Would it make sense to mention PUSH_PROMISEs in > draft-ietf-quic-http-05.html#rfc.section.4.2? > > -- > Charles 'Buck' Krasic | Software Engineer | ckrasic@google.com | +1 (408) > 412-1141 >
- draft-ietf-quic-http-05 and PUSH_PROMISE Charles 'Buck' Krasic
- Re: draft-ietf-quic-http-05 and PUSH_PROMISE Martin Thomson
- Re: draft-ietf-quic-http-05 and PUSH_PROMISE Charles 'Buck' Krasic